1986 Supreme(Ker) 455
High Court of Kerala
M.P. Menon, J.
Dr Philippose Mar Theophilus - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala & Ors - Respondent
O.P. No. 5633 of 1986
Decided On : 15-10-1986
The court emphasized the importance of the Director's discretion under R.5A and the need for a careful consideration of complicated questions of fact and law in cases involving change of ownership and management of educational institutions.
Headnote:
The case involved a dispute over the change in the management of a school and the true scope of the power of the Director of Public Instruction under R.5A of Chap.3 of the Kerala Education Rules. The court examined the provisions of the Kerala Education Act and the Rules, emphasizing the appointment of a manager responsible for running the institution in accordance with the Act and the Rules. The court highlighted the negative terms of R.5A, which required previous permission of the Director for any change of management involving change of ownership. The court also discussed the historical background of the dispute between two factions of the Orthodox (Jacobite) Syrian Christian Community. The judgment set aside the government order and left the respondent free to establish their rights through the ordinary courts and then approach the Director of Public Instruction again under R.5A.
M.P. Menon, J.
1. Has there been a change in the management of the Mar Athnasius High School, Nedumbassery, involving a change of ownership also? What is the true scope of the power of the Director of Public Instruction, in granting previous permission for effecting such change, under R.5A of Chap.3 of the Kerala Education Rules? These are the two questions arising for consideration in this writ petition. The second is clearly a question of law. The first may broadly fit into the scheme of a question of fact; but as will presently be seen, a decision on it, on the peculiar facts of this case, is connected with decisions on some questions of law also.
2. Any person of body of persons permitted to establish and maintain a private school (which includes an aided school like the one here) is the "educational agency" of the school, under S.2(2) of the Kerala Education Act. Under S.7 any educational agency may appoint a person to be the manager of the school "under this Act", subject to the approval of such officer as Government may authorise for the purpose. The manager so approved shall be responsible for the conduct of the school in accordance with the provisions of the Act. The properties of the school shall be in his possession and control, and it shall be his duty to maintain records and accounts, as prescribed Chap.3 of the Rules deal with management of private schools. R.(1) classifies private educational institution as (i) those under individual educational agency and (ii) those under Corporate Educational Agency. Where the right to conduct the school is vested in an individual in his own right or as the representative of a joint family, the "agency" will be individual; and in all other cases, it will be corporate. Corporate agencies will include cases, among others, where the right is vested in an "institution of trust" or in "an ecclesiastical office of any religious denomination", R.2 insists that in the case of Corporate agencies, the constitution of the educational agency "to the extent and in so far as it relates to the management of any school" must be subject to rules approved by the Director prescribing, among other things, matter specified in the rule. The rules also requires that any subsequent change in such rules could operate only after obtaining the Director's approval. R.3 provides that the educational management of an aided school may be vested by the educational agency in a "Manager" who shall be responsible to the Department for the management of the institution. Under R.4, Educational officers shall be competent to approve appointment of managers and also changes in the personnel of Managers. R.5 requires the changes in the personnel of the Managers shall immediately be reported to the Educational officer and approval obtained; and the Note to the Rule makes explicit, what is implicit in R.5A. that the provisions of R.4 and R.5 do not apply to change of management involving change of ownership R.5A reads:-
"5A Change of management involving change of ownership - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, no change of Management of any aided school involving change of ownership shall be effected except with the previous permission of the Director The Director may grant such permission unless the grant of such permission will, in his opinion, adversely affect the working of the institution and the interests of the staff and the person to whom the Management is transferred.
(2) Any person aggrieved by an order under sub-r.(1) may, within 30 days from the date of receipt of the order, prefer an appeal to the Government."
R.6 stipulates that all correspondence relating to the management of the school is to be carried on by the Manager or a person appointed by him and approved by the Manager. R.7 authorises the Director to declare a Manager unfit to hold the office under certain circumstances and to require the educational agency to appoint another in his place. R.8 prohibits certain classes of