SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Ker) 781

K.T.SANKARAN
M. A. Ahamad Kunhi – Appellant
Versus
M. A. Fathima – Respondent


JUDGMENT

K.T. Sankaran, J.

1. Defendants 1, 4 and 5 in a suit for partition, filed by the first respondent herein, are the appellants. The Trial Court decreed the suit granting 1/39 share to the plaintiff, which was confirmed by the Appellate Court. The parties are Muslims.

2. The plaint schedule property along with other properties belonged to the father of the plaintiff and defendants. After the death of the father, as per Ext. A1 partition deed dated 02/12/1985, the properties which belonged to him were partitioned among the plaintiff, the defendants and their mother. The plaint schedule property was allotted to the shares of the mother and defendants 4 and 5. Thereafter, the mother died. The plaintiff claims her share in the fractional interest of the mother in the plaint schedule property.

3. The first defendant contended that the mother had executed Ext. B1 Will on 25/09/1989 bequeathing her fractional right in favour of defendants 4 and 5 and after the death of the mother, the plaintiff and the first defendant consented to the disposition under the Will. Defendants 4 and 5 raised similar contentions as raised by the first defendant. However, they also contended that after the d

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top