SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ker) 1578

P.D.RAJAN
Aravind Vaidyar Cheriyakken Smaraka Marma Chikilsalayam – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


ORDER

P.D. Rajan, J.

1. The revisional power conferred under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on the High Court is a special jurisdiction to correct the miscarriage of justice arising from the erroneous orders, which may arise from the misconception of law, irregularity of procedure or order and misreading of evidence. This revisional power is discretionary one and one cannot claim it as a vested right, when there is vested right in an appeal. The appellant has a statutory right in an appeal to demand adjudication upon a question of law or question of fact or of both. While exercising revisional jurisdiction, the petitioner has no such right, but he has the right to bring the case to the notice of the court and it is for the court to interfere in exceptional cases when it feels that substantial injustice has been done.

2. The revision petitioners were charge sheeted in C.C.485 of 2002 of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Mananthavady for having committed offence punishable under Section 143, 147, 353, 506(i) r/w with 149 IPC. The charge is that on 4.9.2002 at 6.30 pm, accused 1 to 4 and five others formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and in furtherance o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top