C.T. Ravikumar, J.

1. The captioned appeal is filed against the judgment and decree passed by the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Ernakulam in L.A.R.No.22/2008. The claimant is the appellant and the acquisition and requisitioning authorities are respectively the first and second respondents, in this appeal. An extent of 9.12 Ares (22.53 cents) of property comprised in Survey No.666/10 of Kakkanad village was acquired from the appellant for the purpose of expansion of Info Park. Section 4(1) notification was issued in that regard on 16.1.2006. Dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, viz., `48,900/- per Are (`19798.57 per cent), the appellant received the compensation under protest and sought for a reference under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act. The Reference Court on evaluation of the evidence, enhanced the land value to `1,42,288/- per Are (`57606/- per cent). It is still dissatisfied with the enhancement granted by the Reference Court and seeking further enhancement that the captioned appeal has been preferred.

2. Before the Reference Court, the appellant-claimant got herself examined as AW1 besides getting examined the Village Of