1. First petitioner and first respondent are husband and wife respectively. The second petitioner is the mother-in-law and the third petitioner is the sister-in-law of the first respondent. The first respondent filed O.P.No.300 of 2016 before the Family Court, Ettumanoor seeking reliefs against the petitioners herein.

2. The crux of the allegation of the first respondent was that, she was employed in Doha and had earned substantially. During the matrimonial relationship, first petitioner, who was heavily indebted, was given huge amounts by the first respondent to save him from financial difficulties and for starting a business. It was advanced on a specific understanding that the building covered by document No.1 of 2016 will be assigned to her. While so, first respondent expressed her intention to purchase an item of property. Money was advanced by her to the first petitioner who purchased an item of property comprised in document No.3 of 2016 in his own name. Later, matrimonial disputes arose. She initiated proceedings before the Family Court contending inter alia, that, though both the properties stood in the name of the first petitioner, actual physical possession of t