C.K.ABDUL REHIM, R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
SUMA W/O. KADAVIL PARAMBIL VEETTIL PRABHAKARAN – Appellant
Versus
SINIMOL D/O. GOPALAKRISHNAN – Respondent
NARAYANA PISHARADI, J.
1. This Original Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the legality and validity of Ext.P6 proclamation of sale made by the Family Court, Irinjalakuda in E.P No.11/2013 in O.P No.673/2005.
2. The petitioner herein is the sister of the second respondent. The first respondent is the wife of the second respondent. She had filed O.P No.673/2005 against the second respondent for granting a decree for return of money and gold ornaments. She obtained a decree against the second respondent in that case for realization of an amount of Rs.3,50,250/-with interest @ 18% per annum from 10-06-2005 till the date of realization. She filed E.P No.11/2013 for execution of the aforesaid decree. During the execution proceedings, the property which originally belonged to the father of the second respondent was attached. Then the petitioner herein filed an application as E.A No.12/2014 claiming half right over the aforesaid property. As per the order dated 25-09-2015, the execution court found that the entire property is not liable to be sold in the execution proceedings and that the decree holder is entitled to realize the decree deb
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.