SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Ker) 533

C.K.ABDUL REHIM, R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
SUDHEERKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
PRAVEENA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SRI. L. RAJESH NARAYAN

JUDGMENT :

R.Narayana Pisharadi, J

An order granting temporary injunction is interlocutory in nature. Appeal against an order of temporary injunction passed by a Family Court is not maintainable. This is the dictum laid down by a Division Bench of this Court consisting one of us (Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim) in Manga Lakshmi v. Basanth Kumar (2016 (3) KHC 111 : 2016(2) KLT 776). But, this appeal is filed ignoring the aforesaid declaration of law made by this Court in Manga Lakshmi (supra).

2. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage was solemnised on 06.10.2005. The appellant filed O.P.No.1222 of 2017 against the respondent in the Family Court, Thrissur for granting a decree for cancellation of the settlement deed No.4048/2012 which was executed by him in favour of the respondent in respect of the petition schedule property. His plea in the original petition is that the settlement deed executed by him is a sham document and that the respondent has not acquired any right over the petition schedule property by virtue of that document.

3. The case O.P.No.1222/2017 was subsequently transferred to the Family Court, Palakkad and numbered as O.P.No.264 of 2018. Thereafter, t























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top