C.K.ABDUL REHIM, R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
SUDHEERKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
PRAVEENA – Respondent
R.Narayana Pisharadi, J
An order granting temporary injunction is interlocutory in nature. Appeal against an order of temporary injunction passed by a Family Court is not maintainable. This is the dictum laid down by a Division Bench of this Court consisting one of us (Justice C.K.Abdul Rehim) in Manga Lakshmi v. Basanth Kumar (2016 (3) KHC 111 : 2016(2) KLT 776). But, this appeal is filed ignoring the aforesaid declaration of law made by this Court in Manga Lakshmi (supra).
2. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage was solemnised on 06.10.2005. The appellant filed O.P.No.1222 of 2017 against the respondent in the Family Court, Thrissur for granting a decree for cancellation of the settlement deed No.4048/2012 which was executed by him in favour of the respondent in respect of the petition schedule property. His plea in the original petition is that the settlement deed executed by him is a sham document and that the respondent has not acquired any right over the petition schedule property by virtue of that document.
3. The case O.P.No.1222/2017 was subsequently transferred to the Family Court, Palakkad and numbered as O.P.No.264 of 2018. Thereafter, t
James v. Jaimon James : 1998 (1) KLT 233
Kumaradasan Nair v. IRIC Sohan : AIR 2009 SC 1333
Mani v. Sangeetha Theatre : (2004) 12 SCC 278
Manga Lakshmi v. Basanth Kumar
Manoharlal v. Seth Hiralal: AIR 1962 SC 527
Nagappa v. Muralidhar: AIR 2008 SC 2010
Ram Sunder Ram v. Union of India : (2007) 13 SCC 255
Rajnibai v. Kamla Devi : AIR 1996 SC 1946
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.