C.K.ABDUL REHIM, R.NARAYANA PISHARADI
Divya J. Nair D/o. Jayan – Appellant
Versus
S. K. Sreekanth, S/o. Thiruvilassery Veettil Sivaramakrishnan Nair – Respondent
R.NARAYANA PISHARADI, J.
1. The solitary test for determining jurisdiction of the court to entertain an application for guardianship of the person of the minor is the 'ordinary residence' of the minor (Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo: AIR 2011 SC 1952).
2. Section 9(1) of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') provides that if the application is with respect to guardianship of the person of the minor, it shall be made to the District Court having jurisdiction in the place where the minor ordinarily resides.
3. What is meant by the expression “the place where the minor ordinarily resides” in Section 9(1) of the Act? Does
4. Now, the facts in brief: The appellant is the mother and the respondent is the father of a girl now aged six years.
On 05.04.2017, when the girl was aged 4½ years old, the mother filed O.P.No.196 of 2017 in the Family Court, Ottappalam for granting her the custody of the child. The respondent entered appearance in the case. He filed an application as I.A.No.1310/2017 praying that the question of jurisdiction of the court to try the case may be decided as a preliminary issue. He contended that the minor child is residing with hi
Harihar Pershad Jaiswal v. Suresh Jaiswal
Virabala v. Shah Harichand Ratanchand
Shah Harichand Ratanchand v. Virbbal
Harshadbhai Zinabhai Desai v. Bhavnaben Harshadbhai Desai
Sanjay Agarwal v. Krishna Agarwal
Reegan Jayakumar v. Shami Shahul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.