SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Ker) 1465

C.T.RAVIKUMAR, ANIL K.NARENDRAN
Abdulla, S/O Kunhamu – Appellant
Versus
Ismalutty Master, S/O Ibrahim Haji – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri. Nirmal. S
For the Respondent: Sri. R.Ramadas, Adv., Sri. T.P. Sajid, S.C.

ORDER :

RAVIKUMAR, J.

This revision petition is filed under Section 83(9) of the Waqf Act challenging the judgment dated 28.1.2012 passed by the Waqf Tribunal, Kozhikode in O.S.No.10/2011. The revision petitioner was the 1st defendant, respondents 1 and 2 herein were the plaintiffs, the 3rd respondent was the 3rd defendant and the 4th respondent was the 2nd defendant, before the Tribunal. The suit was one for declaration and injunction. Declaration was sought to the effect that Ext.A2 which is a settlement deedbearing No.1394/1993 of Sub Registry, Chathamangalam, is null and void and not binding on the waqf. Injunction was sought against the 1st and 2nd defendants to restrain them permanently from trespassing upon the plaint schedule property and committing waste thereon and also from doing any acts against the title and possession of the Munnoor Juma Ath Palli. The suit was decreed as sought for. It is aggrieved by the said judgment passed by the Waqf Tribunal in O.S.No.10/2011 that the captioned revision petition has been filed seeking to set aside the judgment.

2. We have heard

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top