P.D.RAJAN
Babu, S/o. Devassia – Appellant
Versus
Thomas Mathew, S/o Mathai – Respondent
1. This appeal has been preferred by the injured against the award in O.P(MV) No.37/2003 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thodupuzha (for short 'Tribunal'). The appellant filed the above petition for compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.3,21,200/-. He was a painter aged 26 years and was getting Rs.3,500/-per month, but the Tribunal took Rs.2,000/-as his monthly income. Being aggrieved by that, the injured preferred this appeal.
2. It would be relevant and useful to refer the facts leading to the accident. The respondents did not dispute in the lower court. The claimant's case was that on 15.12.2002, while he was travelling in an autorickshaw KL.6B/3252 from Vazhavara to Kattapana, when he reached near Vellayamkudy, the driver of the autorickshaw swerved the vehicle, as a result, he lost the control of the vehicle, hit against the wall of a toddy shop and the petitioner sustained serious injuries. Immediately, he was removed to hospital. The owner cum driver was set ex-parte. The insurer admitted the insurance of the vehicle.
3. This claim petition was tried along with OP(MV) No.91/2003 and evidence
Arvind Kumar Mishra v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Dixit Kumar and Ors. v. OM Prakash Goel
Ramesh Chandra v. Randhir Sing
Rajesh and Ors. vs. Rajbir Singh and Ors. 2013 ACJ 1403
S.Suresh v. Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. and another
Ramachadrappa v. Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.
Sayed Sadiq and others v. Divisional Manager
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.