SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 393

SUNIL THOMAS
Mohammed Sabir – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Mumthaz – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Smt. Laliza. T.Y.
For the Respondent: Sri. Rasheed C. Nooranad.

JUDGMENT :

1. Petitioner herein is aggrieved by the order dated 11/6/2019 of the Munsiff Court, Thalasserry in an unnumbered suit.

2. According to the petitioner herein, he obtained MBBS Degree from a college in the year 2018. His name is shown in the Register maintained before the Registrar of Births and Deaths, Thalassery Municipality as “Mohammed Sabir”. He is also the holder of Indian passport No.T2018598 dated 19/3/2019, wherein his name is shown as “Acharath Parakkat Mohammed Sabir”. He had applied for post graduate medical course of US Medical Licensing Examination. His application was rejected on the ground that the name of the petitioner as shown in the medical degree certificate and the passport does not match. He was called upon to produce a court order clarifying that both the names related to one and the same person. Hence, he filed a suit before the Munsiff Court, Thalassery for a declaration to the effect that “Mohammed Sabir” and “Acharath Parakkat Mohammed Sabir” are one and the same person. The above plaint was returned as unnumbered by the learned Munsiff by order dated 11/6/2019 on the ground that the relief sought in the plaint does not fall under section 34 of t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top