A.HARIPRASAD, T.V.ANILKUMAR
Johnson S/o. Maliyekkal – Appellant
Versus
Annie, D/o. Maliyekkal Koonan Kouchouseph, W/o. Therattil Puthusserippadi Devassy – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
T.V. ANILKUMAR, J.
1. The appellants are defendants 1 to 3 in O.S.No. 663/2008 on the files of Principal Sub Judge, Irinjalakuda and being aggrieved by the preliminary decree for partition passed on 30.10.2010 in favour of plaintiffs who are the respondents herein, this appeal is preferred before this Court. The main challenge advanced by appellants opposing partition claimed by the respondents was that the suit items which originally belonged to Kochouseph were not partible in view of alleged execution of Ext-B1 Will dated 05.12.2003 being in their names. The appellants are the wife and two sons of the deceased Kochouseph. The plaintiffs/respondents are the two daughters of the deceased.
2. Sri. Kochouseph, the predecessor of parties died on 29.05.2004 at the age of 81. There is no dispute that if Kochouseph died intestate the appellants and respondents would succeed to him under the provisions of the Indian Succession Act 1925 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The respondents/plaintiffs demanded partition of the property after the death of Kochouseph, alleging that joint possession of the property caused inconvenience to their enjoyment. Appellants resisted the dema
H.Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N.Thimmajamma & Others AIR 1959 SC 443
Janki Narayan Bhoir Vs. Narayan Namdeo Kadam
Janardhanan v. Jayachandran and Others
M.B.Ramesh (D) By L.R.S v. K.M.Veeraje Urs (D) By LRS. & Others
Ramabai Padmakar Patil (Dead) through LRS. And Others v. Rukminibai Vishnu Vekhande & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.