SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 535

A.HARIPRASAD, T.V.ANILKUMAR
Government of Kerala Rep. By The Chief Secretary To The Government of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
Jacob Thomas Arikupuram Mannar P. O. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri.Nagaraj Narayanan
For the Respondent: P.B.Krishnan, Sri.P.M.Neelakandan, Sri.P.B.Subramanyan, Sri.Sabu George

JUDGMENT :

A. HARIPRASAD, J.

1. This appeal, filed under Section 11 of the Kerala Forest (Vesting and Management of Ecologically Fragile Lands) Act, 2003 (in short, "the EFL Act") by the Government of Kerala and the Custodian, Ecologically Fragile Lands and Chief Conservator of Forests, raises very important factual and legal questions relating to the application of the EFL Act to the property under dispute. And, an ancillary question, what is the legal effect, on this proceedings, of a finding rendered by a competent Tribunal under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 (in short, “the Vesting Act”), that the property under dispute is not a private forest, also arises.

2. Facts, in nut shell, are thus: Respondents preferred an application under Section 10(1) of the EFL Act before the Tribunal constituted under Section 9 of the said Act. Averments therein would show that the scheduled property ad-measuring 77.50 acres (31.37 hectares) comprised in survey No.149 Part of Koodaranhi Village in Kozhikode Taluk originally belonged to Arikupurath Thomas, father

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top