IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K.NARENDRAN, J.
Yousuf Chalil, S/o. Mohammed Kutty C and Ors - Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Represented By The Secretary To The Agricultural Department, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram and Ors - Respondent
WP(C).No.15893 of 2019
Decided On : 25-07-2019
Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act- Section 3 ,Section 9(1)- The Constitution of India- Article 226--- When the intention of Section 9 of the Act is to provide the cultivator/farmer/agriculturist a residence within his cultivable land, the petitioner, who purchased 4 cents of paddy land for the purpose of constructing a house, that too in the year 2019, much after the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, is not entitled to seek any exemption from the prohibition of conversion or reclamation of paddy land imposed in Section 3 of the Act, by seeking permission under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Act for reclamation of that paddy land for the construction of a residential building. Viewed in the light of the law laid down in the decision referred to supra, conclusion is irresistible that the petitioner cannot invoke the provisions under sub-section (1) of Section 9 of the Act, in respect of the property covered by Ext.P1 sale deed.
Statement of facts:
The petitioner, who is stated to be the owner of 4 cents of paddy land in Re.Sy.No.143/5-1 of Nannambra Village, covered by Ext.P1 sale deed No.1376/2019 dated 12.04.2019 of the Sub Registrar Office, Tanur has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit him to convert the paddy land covered by Ext.P1 document for constructing a residential house. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 5th respondent Local Level Monitoring Committee to refer Ext.P3 application dated 17.05.2019 to the 4th respondent District Level Authorised Committee with necessary recommendation to consider the same within a time limit stipulated by this Court; and a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time limit stipulated by this Court, on receipt of a recommendation from the 5th respondent.
Finding of the court:
When the petitioner is not entitled to seek exemption from the prohibition of conversion or reclamation of paddy land, in respect of his property covered by Ext.P1 sale deed dated 12.04.2019, by invoking the provision under subsection (1) of Section 9 of the Act, this Court cannot direct consideration of that application in contravention of the statutory provisions, as no mandamus can be issued to do something contrary to law.
Result: Dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner, who is stated to be the owner of 4 cents of paddy land in Re.Sy.No.143/5-1 of Nannambra Village, covered by Ext.P1 sale deed No.1376/2019 dated 12.04.2019 of the Sub Registrar Office, Tanur has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to permit him to convert the paddy land covered by Ext.P1 document for constructing a residential house. The petitioner has also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the 5th respondent Local Level Monitoring Committee to refer Ext.P3 application dated 17.05.2019 to the 4th respondent District Level Authorised Committee with necessary recommendation to consider the same within a time limit stipulated by this Court; and a writ of mandamus commanding the 4th respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time limit stipulated by this Court, on receipt of a recommendation from the 5th respondent.
2. On 11.06.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Government Pleader pointed out that the petitioner purchased the land in question vide Ext.P1 sale deed dated 12.04.2019, which is one executed after the enactment of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
4. The pleadings and materials on record would show that the petitioner purchased the paddy land in question, on 12.04.2019, vide Ext.P1 sale deed, much after the commencement of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008 and the Rules made thereunder.
5. Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, 2008, was enacted to conserve the paddy land and wetland and to restrict the conversion or reclamation thereof, in order to promote growth in the agricultural sector and to sustain the ecological system in the State of Kerala. Clause (iii) of Section 2 of the Act defines the term 'conversion' to mean the situation whereby, land that has been under paddy farming and its allied constructions like drainage channels, ponds, canals, bunds and ridges are put to use for any other purpose. Clause (xii) of Section 2 defines the term 'paddy land' to mean all types of land situated in the State where paddy is cultivated at least once in a year or suitable for paddy cultivation but uncultivated and left fallow, and includes its allied constructions like bunds, drainage channels, ponds and canals; Clause (xviii) of Section 2 defines the term 'wetland' to mean land lying between terrestrial and aquatic systems, where the water table is usually at or near the surface or which is covered by shallow water or characterised by the presence of sluggishly moving or standing water, saturating the soil with water and includes backwaters, estuary, fens, lagoon, mangroves, marshes, salt marsh and swamp forests but does not include paddy lands and rivers.
6. Section 3 of the Act deals with prohibition of conversion or reclamation of paddy land. As per sub-section (1), on and from the date of commencement of this Act, the owner, occupier or the person in custody of any paddy land shall not undertake any activity for the conversion or reclamation of such paddy land, except in accordance with the provisions of this Act. As per sub-section (2), nothing contained in sub-section (1) shall apply to the cultivation of any intermediary crops that are cultivated without changing the ecological nature of that paddy land or the strengthening of the outer bunds for protecting the cultivation.
7. As per clause (i) of sub-section (3) of Section 5 of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Act, the Local Level Monitoring Committee shall have the power, subject to the provisions of the said Act, to recommend to the District Level Authorised Committee for the reclamation of paddy land, for construction of residential building of the owner of the paddy land. As per the provis
Joseph Thomas v. Agricultural Officer, Alappuzha and others
Karnataka SRTC v. Ashrafulla Khan (2002) 2 SCC 560
State of U.P. v. Harish Chandra
State of Punjab v. Renuka Singla
Thankachan K.S. v. District Collector, Alappuzha and others
Union of India v. Kirloskar Pneumatic Co. Ltd.
University of Allahabad v. Dr. Anand Prakash Mishra (1997) 10 SCC 264
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.