SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Ker) 893

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
Abdurahiman P., S/o. Moyin & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Department of Co-operation, Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No.39749 of 2017(P), WP(C) No.5902 of 2018, WP(C) No.19166 of 2019(U), WP(C) No.28791 of 2019(Y), WP(C) No.3960 of 2019(T), WP(C) No.4052 of 2019(F), WP(C) No.4228 of 2019(C), WP(C) No.4229 of 2019(C), WP(C) No.4240 of 2019(D), WP(C) No.5650 of 2019(E), WP(C) No.5651 of 2019(F), WP(C) No.5793 of 2019(Y), WP(C) No.5831 of 2019(D), WP(C) No.6241 of 2019(E), WP(C) No.6308 of 2019(K), WP(C) No.6409 of 2019(A), WP(C) No.6512 of 2019(L), WP(C) No.6730 of 2019(M), WP(C) No.6736 of 2019(N), WP(C) No.9491 of 2019(J)
Decided On : 29-11-2019

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Smt. Aysha Youseff, Sri. C.M. Ebrahim, Sri. Jobi A.Thampi, Smt. M. Kabani Dinesh, Smt. Molly Jacob, Smt. Rabia Beegam T.K. Sri. Shoukath Husain.
For the Respondents:Sri. K.K. Ravindranath, Addl. Advocate General, Government Pleader.

IMPORTANT POINTS
The Government can very well explain to RBI its compliance of conditions as above. It is for the RBI to be satisfied with the conditions stipulated as above. Since final approval is yet to be granted by RBI, it is for RBI alone to decide whether the conditions have to be satisfied or not. It is open for RBI to accept the present procedure adopted so far by the Registrar and District Co-operative Banks or to insist for convening a meeting as above. This Court need not substitute the satisfaction to be entered or arrived at by the RBI at this stage.

Headnote:

Banking Regulation Act, 1949- Section 22-Vires of amended statutory provisions and the process involved in amalgamation- The banking activity is regulated by Section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It is for the RBI to decide in what manner final approval can be given. No challenge would be maintainable before final approval is granted by the RBI unless there is glaring procedure of violation-The Administrators are the best authorities to take a decision as to the manner in which the amalgamation process should be completed. Any person who is finally aggrieved by the final approval can very well challenge such final approval.

Statement of facts:

Writ petitions are filed by Primary Co-operative Banks, individual members of such co-operative banks or Societies and others challenging vires of amended statutory provisions and the process involved in amalgamation.

Finding of the court:

The Kerala State Co-operative Bank is a scheduled bank and that it cannot amalgamate with a non scheduled bank. It is further argued that NABARD is the major stake holder and creditor as far as the District Co-operative Bank is concerned-No scheme of amalgamation can be implemented by invoking provisions under the K.C.S Act to amalgamate with a scheduled bank listed under the RBI as the scheduled bank is regulated by the Central Legislation. The banking activity is regulated by Section 22 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. It is for the RBI to decide in what manner final approval can be given. No challenge would be maintainable before final approval is granted by the RBI unless there is glaring procedure of violation.

Result: Dismissed

JUDGMENT :

Lives are changed when people connect. Life is changed when everything is connected.

--, [An American telecom enterprise], [Qualcom motto].

In modern business model, success depends upon how one design or structure the business. The big shift in the business in a market economy is attributable to convergence, interdependency and technology. This era of acceleration is relatable to the afore-mentioned factors. The current model of business enterprise is deemed to be vulnerable if they fail to translate the above mentioned key factors into reality or to put them into practice. A co-operative movement representing collective ownership in their economic pursuit is no exception for the application of factors as above. While it is necessary to assert autonomy of cooperative enterprises through decision making at basic unit level, its affiliation to the central authority cannot be ignored to meet the challenges faced by it. The edifice of co-operative enterprise is built on autonomy with subsidiarity and solidarity as its bulwarks to remain independent. But that in itself cannot be decisive enough so as to remain competitive in pursuit of market interest. In as far as the urge to remain competitive is concerned it is not the organisational structure alone that matters but it is the factors that determine the interest in the market. Therefore, challenges in this regard are multi-fold. The policy makers may face the risk of existential crises if cooperative enterprises remain non responsive to market demands. It is therefore necessary to be propulsive and to embrace nuances to remain competitive in a market economy. The balancing of co-operative principles and factors reckoning market interest is a delicate task. Balancing interest as an object, the Government decided in principle to amalgamate the District Co-operative Banks with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank. The Government realised that such amalgamation of banks is necessary for the very existence of the Co-operative banks as well for the purpose of economic development and providing financial service to the people. The Government constituted an expert committee to obtain an expert view as per G.O.(Rt).No.488/2016/Co.op, dated 28.9.2016. Accordingly, Professor M.S. Sreeram, IIM Bangalore, was appointed as the Chairman of the said committee. The committee suggested layering of the three tier structure into two tier structure. The committee was of the view that the present three tier structure of the District Co-operative Banks at the middle level only adds to the costs and that they being intermediary, can be avoided to undertake a two tier structure with the Kerala State Co-operative Bank and Primary Co-operative Banks being its constituents. The Government, in order to realize this expert opinion, invoked legislative mandate and amended statutory provisions for amalgamation. This resulted in filing these writ petitions.

2. The central issue that emerges in these writ petitions is how far the balancing exercise has been maintained through the legislation between the co-operative enterprise and the market interest, which is the ultimate cause for this amendment.

3. The present scenario of the co-operative banking sector as evident from Rule 15 of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, 1969 (for short, the “K.C.S Rules”) and proposed scenario based on amendment are as follows:

Present Scenario

Proposed scenario

Kerala State Co-operative Bank

(upper layer as Apex body)

Kerala State Co-operative Bank

District Co-operative Banks

(mid level layer)

Primary Agricultural Credit Societies, Urban Co-operative Banks etc.

Primary Agricultural Credit Societies, Urban Co-operative Banks etc.

(lower level layer)

 

Before the amendment, the State Co-operative Bank at Apex level having only District Co-operative Bank as its memb

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon Back to top