SUNIL THOMAS
Kunhimoideen @ Bava – Appellant
Versus
Thalekkara Sulaikha, W/o. Mustafa – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The first plaintiff in OS No.387/2014 of the Munsiff Court, Parappanangadi, aggrieved by the common order in CMA Nos.6/2018 and 9/2018 of the Sub Court, Tirur which modified by order in IA No.1448/2017 in IA No.2416/2014, has preferred O.P.(C) No.1451/2019.
2. Defendants 1 to 4 in the above suit are arrayed as respondents 1 to 4. Second plaintiff is arrayed as the 5th respondent in the original petition. The suit was one for partition of the plaint schedule properties that belonged to the mother of the plaintiffs and the defendants. Defendants resisted the suit contending that they had exclusive right over the properties and that the properties were not partible. Along with the suit. I.A.No.2416/2014 was filed seeking an order of injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the plaint schedule properties. It was allowed ex parte, by order dated 5/11/2014, restraining the defendants from alienating the plaint schedule property and creating any document on the strength of gift deed No. 1644/1985, claimed to have been executed by the mother of the plaintiffs and the defendants. After hearing defendants, the ex parte injunction was made absolute on 12/8/2015. The s
Abdul Hamid v . Karim Bux & Ors AIR 1973 All 67
Aravindaksha Menon and others v. Raghava Menon 2007 (2) KHC 287
Bankim Chandra v . Chandi Prasad AIR 1956 Pat 271
Nandipati Rami Reddi v. Nandipati Padma Reddy AIR 1978 AP 30
Raj Chandra Gupta v. Ramesh Kishore AIR 1965 All 546
Nagar Mahapalika v. Ved Prakash AIR 1976 All 264
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.