C.S.DIAS
K. A. Sabu – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
ORDER :
The question that emerges for consideration in this bail application is whether an accused who has undergone custody in two spells in the same crime is entitled to get the two spells combined to claim “default bail” under proviso (a) (i) to sub-section (2) of Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The undisputed antecedent facts for the disposal of this bail application are:
(ii) The First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.349/2019 was initially registered by the Peerumedu Police Station under Section 174 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for brevity, hereinafter referred to as “Code”), on 21.06.2019, before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Court, Idukki. Later, the case was taken over by the Crime Branch and renumbered as Crime No
CBI v. Anupam Kulkarni [(1992) 3 SCC 141]
Chaganti Satyanarayana v. State of AP [(1986) 3 SCC 141]
Gurucharan Singh v. State (Delhi Admn) [(1978) 1 SCC 118]
Mohamed Iqbal Madar Sheikh v. State of Maharashtra [(1996) 1 SCC 722
Pragyana Singh Thakur v. State of Maharashtra [(2011) 10 SCC 445]
Pradeep Ram vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 3193]
Rakesh Kumar Paul vs. State of Assam [(2017) 15 SCC 67]
Sanjay Dutt v. State through C.B.I.
Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra [(2001) 5 SCC 453]
Union of India Vs. Thamisharasi and others
Vipul Shital Prasad Agarwal v. State of Gujarat and another [(2013) 1 SCC 197]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.