P.SOMARAJAN
Kannoth Kottaran Omana Amma D/o. Kunhikrishnan Nambiar – Appellant
Versus
Chathoth Balachandran S/o. Kunhikannan Nambiar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The 9th defendant who is the appellant herein is the foster daughter of one Narayanan Nambiar and his wife Sreedevi Amma. Narayan Nambiar during his life time had executed Ext.B1 registered Will, by which, the properties were bequeathed to his wife Sreedevi Amma with a further clause that in the event of any property found left out on her demise, the same would go to their foster daughter, the 9th defendant. After the death of Sreedevi Amma, her natural legal heirs came up with the suit claiming right over the property by devolution. It was contested by the 9th defendant, the foster daughter, claiming exclusive right over the property based on the clause in the Will directing ultimate disposition in her favour. Thus, the construction of Ext.B1 Will and the legal validity of ultimate disposition made therein were came up as substantial question of law.
2. This Court in Smitha K.S. and another v. Devaki and another (2020 (2) KHC 42) had the occasion to consider the impact of wording 'after the death of both of us, the property will go to' in a testamentary succession and held that the words indicate only a life interest. It is further held that when an apparently absolute
Smitha K.S. and another v. Devaki and another 2020 (2) KHC 42
Rameshwar Bakhsh Singh and others v. Balraj Kaur and others AIR 1935 PC 187
Ramkishorelal and another v. Kamalnarayan 1963 Suppl (2) SCR 417 : AIR 1963 SC 890
Mauleshwar Mani and others v. Jagdish Prasad and others AIR 2002 SC 727
Sadaram Suryanarayana v. Kalla Surya Kantham AIR 2011 SC 294 : (2010) 13 SCC 147
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.