A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
Vilasini – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Secretary, Department of Excise – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Toddy is considered as a natural alcohol and health drink. To an average tourist, Kerala is famous for toddy, but, the operation of toddy shops does not bring cheer to the residents in the neighbourhood of such toddy shops. The State of Kerala is known to be a consumer State and its exponential growth in lifestyle has thrown up many challenges on the social front. Toddy shops run in the primitive style have become an eyesore to its neighbours. In social life, anything that is lopsided or degenerated in quality is decried in different forms. These writ petitions resemble a cause for those values cared and nurtured by Keralites. The issue of privacy was not raised as the main issue in these writ petitions. These writ petitions filed for different reliefs in varied grounds, urge the common concern in regard to the pain and suffering faced by each one of them on account of the location of toddy shops near to their houses. This Court, realising that this is related more to the privacy of those individuals, decided to proceed with the issues raised in these writ petitions on a broader parameter to assimilate the concern within the frame of the right to privacy. To further the C
Basant Yadav v. State of Bihar
Ganapathy Iyer and Others v. State of Kerala and others
K.S.Puttuswamy (retired) v. Union of India
M.C.Mehta v. Union of India and Others
My Hindusthan paints v. State of Kerala
Nar Singh Pal v. Union of India and others (2000) 3 SCC 588
Olga Tellis & Ors. vs. Bombay Municipal Corporation
Prasanth Babu M. v. Kannur Kalluchethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangom
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.