C.T.RAVIKUMAR, K.HARIPAL
Kasim V. K. S/o Kunhabdulla Haji – Appellant
Versus
M. Ashraf S/o Ammed – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K. HARIPAL, J.
1. Whether an Additional District Court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition touching the matters falling under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act; Can a party to an arbitration dispute challenge the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator for the first time before the court in a petition filed under Section 34 of the Act, are the two questions posed for consideration in this appeal.
2. This is an appeal preferred under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred to as the Act, challenging the correctness of the order of the III Additional District Judge, Kozhikode in OP (Arbitration) No. 270/2018. That was a petition filed by the appellant before the District Court, under Section 34 of the Act seeking to set aside the award of the Arbitrator, dated 29.09.2018.
3. It is the common case that the appellant and the respondent were partners in M/s. Shalimar Jewellery, a partnership concern dealing in the sale of gold. The partnership agreement was executed on 28.10.2013. Before the execution of that agreement, there were three partners in the firm, the appellant, the respondent and one V.K. Moidu. When Moidu chose to move out, the a
A. Ayyasami vs. Parasasivam and Others
Gas Authority of India Limited and Another vs. Keti Constructions (I) Ltd. and Others
Globsyn Technologies Ltd. vs. Eskaaycee Infosys
M/s. V.H. Patel and Company and Others vs. Hirubhai Himabhai Patel and Others
Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board and Another vs. ANSALDO Energia, S.P.A. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.