IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Alexander Thomas, N.Anil Kumar, JJ.
State Of Kerala, Represented By The Secretary To Government, Forest And Wildlife Department And Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
K.A.Abdul Rahiman – Respondent
OP(KAT).No.52 OF 2021
Decided On : 18-02-2021
Articles 226 & 227 - Kerala Administrative Tribunal - Rule 28(b)(i)(14) of the KS & SSR
Fact of the Case:
The case involved a petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the impugned order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal and seeking notional promotion and pensionary benefits for the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the impugned order for recommencement of disciplinary enquiry, 20 years after the alleged incident and after the petitioner's retirement, was unreasonable, improper, illegal, and ultra vires. The Court also upheld the Tribunal's direction for notional promotion and consequential pensionary benefits for the petitioner.
Issues: The issues included the validity of the impugned order for recommencement of disciplinary enquiry, the entitlement of the petitioner to notional promotion and pensionary benefits, and the delay in compliance with the Tribunal's directions.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that conducting a disciplinary enquiry 20 years after the alleged incident and after the petitioner's retirement violated the principles of natural justice and fairness. The Court also upheld the applicability of Rule 28(b)(i)(14) of the KS & SSR to the petitioner's case, allowing notional promotion and pensionary benefits without convening the Departmental Promotion Committee.
Final Decision: The Original Petition was dismissed, and the petitioners were ordered to comply with the Tribunal's directions for notional promotion and pensionary benefits within six weeks.
JUDGMENT :
Alexander Thomas, J.
The prayers in the aforecaptioned Original Petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India are as follows: (see page Nos.15 & 16 of the paper book of this O.P) :
(ii) To declare that the direction in Annexure A10 Government to conduct fresh enquiry against the Respondent for his dereliction of duty is legal and valid
(iii) To declare that the Respondent is not eligible for notional promotion as claimed by him or any consequential revision of pensionary benefits on the basis of the promotions directed to be granted to him, by virtue of the Exhibit P4 impugned order
(iv) Any other order or direction as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Heard Sri.B.Vinod, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners (State of Kerala, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & another) in the O.P/respondents in the O.A and Sri.P.J.Elvin Peter, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent in the O.P/sole original applicant in the O.A before the Tribunal.
3. The prayers in Ext.P1 Original Application, O.A.No.2315 of 2017 filed before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram, by the 4th respondent/Original Applicant are as follows : (see page Nos.30 and 31 of the paper book)
(ii) Direct the respondent to give notional promotion to the applicant to the post of Asst. Conservator of Forests with effect from 12.12.2000 on which date his immediate junior was promoted and direct disbursal of all monetary benefits to the applicant including revision of pension, full pension, gratuity and other dues.
(iii) Grant such other relief the Honourable Tribunal may deem fit and proper to grant in the nature of the application.”
4. The Tribunal has now rendered the impugned Ext.P4 final order dated 27.11.2019 in OA No.2315 of 2017, whereby, the following directions have been issued in paragraphs 7 and 8 on internal page 4 and 5 thereof: (see page Nos. 187 and 188 of the paper book)
8. The first respondent is therefore directed to consider the claim of the applicant for promotion as Assistant Conservator of Forests with effect from the date of promotion of his immediate junior. The first respondent shall pass such orders within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is also directed that the applicant shall be eligible for consequential pensionary benefits on the basis of the promotions to be granted to him based on the above directions. Applicant may submit an appropriate representation along with a copy of this order before the first respondent for such consideration.”
5. The original applicant had entered service as directly a recruited Forest Range Officer under the Forest Department of the State Government in the year 1985 and except a grade promotion in the same post he has not secured any regular/cadre promotion to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.