N.NAGARESH
Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies, pursuant to Sections 164 and 167. Common questions of law arise for consideration in all these writ petitions and hence the writ petitions are heard together and disposed of by a common judgment.
2. The Companies Act, 1956 was enacted with the objective to consolidate and amend the law relating to the companies and certain other associations. The said Act has been in force for about fifty-five years and was amended several times. In view of changes in the national and international economic environment and expansion and growth of economy, the Central Government decided to repeal the Companies Act, 1956 and enact a new legislation to provide for new provisions to meet the changed national and international economic environment and further accelerate the expansion and growth of economy. And for this purpose, the Companies Bill, 2009 was introduced on 3rd August, 2009 in the Lok Sabha. The said Bill was referred to the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance for examinat
Dr. Subramanian Swamy v. Director
Narmada Bachao Andolan and others v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others [(2011) 7 SCC 639]
Official Liquidator v. P.A.Tendolkar [(1973) 1 SCC 602]
Sajjan Singh v. State of Punjab [AIR 1964 SC 464]
State Bank of Patiala and others v. S.K.Sharma [(1996) 3 SCC 364]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.