SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 481

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S. MANIKUMAR, SHAJI P. CHALY, JJ.
Sibha S. – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 11054 of 2021
Decided On : 19-05-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Smt. Parvathy Vijayan, Smt. Pramitha Augustine, Sri. Venketesh Bose.
For the Respondent: Sri. P. Vijayakumar, Sri. K.V. Sohan.

Point of Law: Process of rationalisation of the infirmities in the economy can be put in serious jeopardy and, therefore, it is necessary that while dealing with economic legislations, this Court, while not jettisoning its jurisdiction to curb arbitrary action or unconstitutional legislation, should interfere only in those few cases where the view reflected in the legislation is not possible to be taken at all

Headnote:

Annual income of the beneficiary citizens, as the eligibility criteria for free vaccine - 1st and 2nd respondents to fix and publish the rate of vaccine in Kerala for the COVID-19 for Non eligible category, based on their annual Income - Petitioner is a lawyer by profession. She has filed this public interest writ petition seeking interference of this Court, on a decision taken by the respondents, which according to her, is in total violation of the concept of a welfare State and principles of good governance

Finding of the Court:

scope of judicial review of an administrative action is very limited. Unless the Court comes to a conclusion that the decision-maker has not understood the law correctly that regulates his decision-making power or when it is found that the decision of the decision-maker is vitiated by irrationality and that too on the principle of “Wednesbury unreasonableness” or unless it is found that there has been a procedural impropriety in the decision-making process, it would not be permissible for the High Court to interfere in the decision-making process. It is also equally well settled that it is not permissible for the Court to examine the validity of the decision but this Court can examine only the correctness of the decision-making process - petitioner has not made out a case, to secure any relief as is sought for in the writ petition

Result: Petition dismissed

JUDGMENT :

1. Instant Public Interest Litigation is filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:

    “(i) To Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ or order, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to classify, based on the annual income of the beneficiary citizens, as the eligibility criteria for free vaccine.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to fix and publish the rate of vaccine in Kerala for the COVID-19 for Non eligible category, based on their annual Income.”

2. Short facts leading to filing of the writ petition are that, petitioner is a lawyer by profession. She has filed this public interest writ petition seeking interference of this Court, on a decision taken by the respondents, which according to her, is in total violation of the concept of a welfare State and principles of good governance. Petitioner has also stated that while providing free vaccination to the entire citizens, irrespective of their economic status, it would cause huge debt to the State Exchequer, which has to be compensated by the poor and weaker sections of the society.

3. Petitioner has further stated that the State of Kerala represented by the Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram, respondent No. 2, has taken a decision to obtain One Crore vaccine for COVID-19 disease from the companies, on payment of cost, which is fixed as Rs. 400/- per dose, for all the citizens free of cost and further, to distribute it among the entire citizens of the State, at a cost of Rs. 1,300/- Crores.

4. Petitioner has further stated that the decision to vaccinate all the citizens free, by spending huge amounts is nothing, but for political gain, at the cost of debt to each citizen. The demography based on the financial status of the State would clearly indicate that about 50% of the total population can afford the expense of vaccination themselves. Thus, half of the amounts spent on vaccines can be saved for other public good. However, the respondents have decided to vaccinate all, free, at the cost of the people's money, virtually denying the public benefits the taxpayers ought to have received with this money.

5. It is further stated that in the present scenario, this decision for free vaccination, when vaccines are in shortage and people are running around, should have been avoided. The vaccines that are being imported with Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and the 1st respondent's consent, ought to have been made available in public markets for the economically capable group to use it. This could allow the poorer section to have access to the vaccine with ease.

6. Petitioner has also stated that since the second wave of COVID-19 Pandemic is in progress and a third wave is expected by October, 2021, it is the duty of the respondents to ensure that all the citizens are vaccinated at least once before such time. According to the petitioner, this can be achieved only if, imported vaccines are made available in the market. However, if free vaccines are available for all sections of the society, it is seldom that people will opt for costly vaccines. Thus, according to the petitioner, there will be huge crowding for the free vaccine and no purpose will be served by imported vaccine, and the number of non vaccinated citizens will remain high. This would adversely affect the health of the citizens and in controlling the pandemic, which may outgrow drastically in the entire society by then.

7. Petitioner has further stated that the respondents ought to have considered the fact that if free vaccines are given, the same can be done only through proper Government machinery. Considering the large population of our country, it will be a herculean task to vaccinate all with the available vaccine produced in India, by the Serum Institute and Bharat Bio-Tech. The respondents will be forced to rely on proven foreign vaccines. The foreign vaccine will be very costly and it will increas

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top