IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P. SOMARAJAN, J.
Cardinal Mar George Alencherry S/o. Late Philipose - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam & Ors. - Respondents
Crl. MC Nos. 8936 of 2019, 205 of 2020, 1414 of 2020, 1409 of 2020, 2138 of 2020, 2136 of 2020, 9115 of 2019
Decided On : 12-08-2021
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 , 178 and 219 - Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 25 and 26 –Indian Penal Code, 1908 – Sections 120 B, 406, 409, 418, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468 and 34 - Saving of inherent powers of High Court – Party to a Criminal Conspiracy Other than a criminal conspiracy – If it is pertaining to the Government property as defined under Section 3 or a puramboke land as defined under Section 4 of the Act, necessarily, the offence of cheating and creation of forged document made mentioned in clause (b) of Section 7 would come into effect, besides the offence under the said section as against the officers, who failed to report unlawful occupation of land. The non-mention of title or interest, or its acquisition or document of acquisition of title or interest over the property covered by the said document raises a reasonable doubt as to the nature of the property and hence the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised to secure the ends of justice, when it is not dealt with under the provisions of the law by the Government or the competent authority thereof.
Finding of the Court:
Court seeking a mandamus for registration of crime in which a direction was issued by t court, but it was reversed in appeal based on which investigation was conducted and a closure report was submitted by police - He had also availed a loan of from South Indian Bank without initiating any discussion or arriving at any decision as per provisions of Canon law and law in force - whether there is creation of implied public trust with respect to the properties held by church - whether it is a property owned by public or Government or it is a puramboke land or a no-man’s land - Whether the Malankara Orthodox Church is an Episcopal church governed by its 1934 constitution and whether a scheme has to be framed for its management – Held, Court it is pertaining to Government property as defined under Section 3 or a puramboke land as defined under Section 4 of Act, necessarily, offence of cheating and creation of forged document made mentioned in clause (b) of Section 7 would come into effect, besides offence under said section as against officers, who failed to report unlawful occupation of land - Dispute pertains to execution of various sale deeds in respect of properties held by Syro Malabar Church, a religious congregation allegedly without compliance of requirements as per byelaws of Church causing heavy financial losses to church and its parishioners - Deserve only Dismissal.
Result: Dismissed
ORDER :
A batch of seven cases have come up in relation to the alienation of properties purportedly belonging to Syro Malabar Church viz, Crl.M.C.Nos.8936/2019, 205/2020, 1409/2020, 1414/2020, 2136/2020, 2138/2020 and 9115/2019.
2. One Joshy Varghese had filed a complaint in C.M.P.No.5003/2018 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakkanad alleging commission of offences under Section 120 B, 406, 409, 418, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468 and 34 IPC against the Major Archbishop of Syro Malabar Church and another. After preliminary enquiry in terms of Section 202 Cr.P.C., the Magistrate took cognizance under Annexure A2 order and issued summons to the petitioner for the offences coming under the purview of Section 120 B, 406, 423 r/w Section 34 IPC. A revision was preferred against Annexure A2 order before the Sessions Court, Ernakulam under Section 397 Cr.P.C. in Crl.R.P.No.20/2019. The learned Sessions Judge dismissed the revision under Annexure A3 order. It is against the aforesaid two orders and to quash the entire proceedings, the petitioner Cardinal Mar George Alencherry, the Major Archbishop of Syro Malabar Church challenged under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in Crl.M.C.No.8936/2019.
3. Crl.M.C.Nos.205/2020, 1409/2020, 1414/2020, 2136/2020 and 2138/2020 were filed by Cardinal Mar George Alencherry with respect to the complaints in which he is the accused. It is submitted that the first complaint at Maradu was numbered as C.M.P.No.2/2018 wherein the learned Magistrate had directed the complainant to examine further witnesses on his behalf and this was challenged by the complainant before this court and the same ended in dismissal. The said matter is still pending consideration before the Magistrate.
4. It is submitted that the complaint preferred by Sri. Joshy Varghese before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kakkanad, is by concealing the earlier complaint before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Maradu, in C.M.P.No.2/2018 on the same set of facts and cause of action which is still pending consideration.
5. One Mr. Polachan Puthupara had approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, based on the very same set of facts and allegation as per Annexure -10 complaint, which was dismissed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, on the ground that the issue involved is of civil nature by Annexure A6 order.
6. Yet another complaint was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Ernakulam, in Crl.M.P. No.820/2010 by one Pappachan Varghese predicted on the same set of facts which was referred under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Consequently a crime was registered. But it was referred by the police on the ground of mistake of facts.
7. The Central Crime Branch Police, Ernakulam, launched a thorough investigation by examining 83 witnesses including the 36 persons who had purchased various properties and concluded the investigation stating that internal rules governing the administration of diocese were duly complied with both by their Financial Committee and Consulters Forum at each stage of transaction and a closure report Annexure A7 was submitted.
8. One Shine Varghese had approached the Central Police Station, Ernakulam, directly by filing a complaint based on the same set of allegations and approached this court seeking a mandamus for registration of crime in which a direction was issued by this court, but it was reversed in appeal based on which investigation was conducted and a closure report was submitted by the police.
9. The dispute pertains to the execution of various sale deeds in respect of properties held by the Syro Malabar Church, a religious congregation allegedly without compliance of the requirements as per the bye-laws of the Church causing heavy financial losses to the church and its parishioners. Inter alia, it has been contended that all these sale deeds are the result of criminal conspiracy hatched between the petitioner in collusion with his henchmen and the persons who had purchased the properties.
Hira Lal & Others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Samta Naidu & another v. State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Pramatha Nath Talukdar v. Saroj Ranjan Sarkar
Mahesh Chand v. B. Janardhan Reddy & another
Rajiv Bhatia v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and others
Arathi Bandi v. Bandi Jagadrakshak Rao & others
World Tanker Carrier Corporation. v. SNP Shipping Services (P) Ltd and others
Ambica Industries v. Commissioner of Central Excise
Jagmohan Bahl and another v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
Udyami Evam Khadi Gramodyog Welfare Sanstha and another v. State of U.P. and others
Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and another v. Union of India (Recusal Matter)
State of Gujarat v. Jaswantlal Nathalal
Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda and Others
National Bank of Oman v. Barakara Abdul Aziz and another
Chandra Deo Singh v. Prokash Chandra Bose & others
Mahesh Chand v. B. Janardhan Reddy and another
Varghese v. St. Peter's & Paul's Syrian Orthodox Church
Pratapsinghji N. Desai v. Deputy Charity Commissioner, Gujarat and others
Chairman Madappa v. M.N. Mahanthadevaru and others
Major Archbishop Angamaly and Others v. P.A. Lalan Tharakan and Others
Popular Muthiah v. State of represented by Inspector of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.