IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J.
Head Digital Works Private Limited & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) Nos.7785, 7851, 7853 & 8440 of 2021
Decided On : 27-09-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Articles 14, 19(6) and 19(1)(g) - Gaming Act - Section 11 - Police Act - Section 49 - Hyderabad Gambling Act - Section 14 - Kerala Gaming Act, 1960 - Sections 14A, 14 , 3, 2(1), and 2(2) - Kerala Act - Sections 7 and 8 - Gaming" to include wagering or betting - Common gaming house - Whether game of rummy is a game of skill or chance liable to be regulated under the Kerala Act or rules framed thereunder - Whether premises of a club known as Sopanam Arts and Sports Club' situated at Angadipuram were being used as a common gaming house - Whether the petitioner, who was office bearer of the club, at time of raid by Police could be said to be instrumental in conducting common gaming house - Whether playing rummy at club is gambling as defined under Kerala Act - Whether the game of rummy even if it is a game of mere skill is still prohibited under Sections 7 and 8 of the Kerala - Whether Sections and 8 of the Kerala Act either expressly or impliedly exclude the game of rummy as a game of skill Whether the Police is competent to set criminal law in motion in accordance with the Kerala Act, if a case is registered by Police under Sections 7 and 8 of Kerala Act based on credible information or reasonable doubt that the activities carried on by club or its members are not in accordance with law and thereby indulging in unlawful activities or nuisanceOnline Rummy played for stakes" within the purview of the Kerala Gaming Act, 1960 - petitioners are all companies which are engaged in the business of developing and offering online games of skill in India and they are aggrieved by the notification issued by Government - Governments of Travancore, Cochin and Malabar Presidency, was governed with respect to Gambling, by Travancore Public Gambling Act - Punishment of gaming and the keeping of common gaming houses in State of Kerala. As per Section 2(1) - Common gaming house" means any house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or any place whatsoever in which cards, dice, tables or other instruments of gaming are kept or used for profit or gain of the person owning - Wagering or betting. Section 2(2) says that wagering or betting shall be deemed to comprise collection or soliciting of bets, receipt or distribution of winnings or prizes in money or otherwise - Facilitate wagering or betting or such collection, soliciting, receipt or distribution.
Finding of the Court:
Writ petitions already had a prayer seeking declaration and the other writ petitions have been amended including a prayer for declaration – Court hold in affirmative - It is hereby declared that Ext.P6 notification is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India - game does not come within the meaning of 'gambling' or 'gaming', providing a platform for playing the game, which is in nature of business cannot be curtailed – Court hold that "mere skill" contained in Section 14 and "any game element of skill is more predominant than element of chance" contained in Section 14A do not suggest that skill in playing a game is in any manner dependent on stakes - Such playing for stakes or playing not for stakes can never be a criterion to find out whether a game is a game of skill.
Result: Writ petitions are allowed
JUDGMENT :
The question raised in these writ petitions is regarding the power of the Government to include the game "Online Rummy played for stakes" within the purview of the Kerala Gaming Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Act or the Kerala Act). The petitioners are all companies which are engaged in the business of developing and offering online games of skill in India and they are aggrieved by the notification issued by the Government, amending the exemption notification issued on 30.09.1976 under Section 14A of the Act. The reference to the exhibits is as they are produced in W.P.(C) No.7785 of 2021 which is treated as the lead case.
STATUTORY PROVISIONS:-
2. The State of Kerala which was formed by including areas which were under the erstwhile Governments of Travancore, Cochin and Malabar Presidency, was governed with respect to Gambling, by the Travancore Public Gambling Act, III of 1071ME (corresponding to 1896), The Cochin Public Gambling Act, IV of 1082 ME (corresponding to 1907) and the Madras Gaming Act, 1930 (III of 1930). After the formation of the State of Kerala, the Kerala Gaming Act, 1960 was enacted and the aforesaid enactments were repealed (to the extent it applied to the Malabar District, in the case of the Madras Act). The Kerala Gaming Act, 1960 was enacted to make better provision for the punishment of gaming and the keeping of common gaming houses in the State of Kerala. As per Section 2(1), "common gaming house" means any house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or any place whatsoever in which cards, dice, tables or other instruments of gaming are kept or used for the profit or gain of the person owning, occupying, using or keeping such house, room, tent enclosure, vehicle, vessel or place whether by way of charge for the use of instruments of gaming or of the house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or place or otherwise howsoever; and include any house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or place opened, kept or used or permitted to be opened, kept or used for the purpose of gaming. Section 2(2) defines "gaming" to include wagering or betting. Section 2(2) says that wagering or betting shall be deemed to comprise the collection or soliciting of bets, the receipt or distribution of winnings or prizes in money or otherwise, in respect of any wager or bet, or any act which is intended to aid or facilitate wagering or betting or such collection, soliciting, receipt or distribution.
3. The relevant portions of Section 3, and Sections 14 and 14A of the Act, which have a bearing on the issue to be decided read as follows;
(a) being the owner or occupier or having the use of any house, room, tent, enclosure, vehicle, vessel or place, opens, keeps or uses the same for the purpose of gaming-
(i) on a horse-race, or
(ii) on the market price of cotton, bullion or other commodity on the digits of the number used in stating the amount of such variation, or
(iii) on the amount or variation in the market price of any such commodity or in the digits of the number used in stating the amount of such variation, or
(iv) on the market price of any stock or share or on the digits of the number used in stating such price, or
(v) on the number of registration or on the digits of the number of registration of any motor vehicle using a public place, or
(vi) on any transaction or scheme of wagering or betting in which the receipt or distribution of winnings or prizes in money or otherwise is made to depend on chance, or
(b) xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
(c) xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
(d) xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx
shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or both.
Provided xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx”
Section 14. Act not to apply to certain games.-Nothing in the foregoing provisions of this Act shall be held to apply to any game of mere skill wherever played.
Section 14A. Exemptions.-The Government may, if they are satisfied
Dr. K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Bhishambar Dayal Chandra Mohan & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Bijoe Emmanuel & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.
K.S. Puttaswamy & Anr. (Aadhaar) v. Union of India & Anr.
Ramesh Chandra Kachardas Porwal v. State of Maharashtra
State of Bombay v. R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala
R.M.D. Chamarbaugwala v. Union of India
M.J. Sivani & Ors. v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
Shree Bhagwati Steel Rolling Mills v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr.
State of A.P. v. K. Satyanarayana
Fuerst Day Lawson Ltd. v. Jindal Exports Ltd.
State of U.P. v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd.
N. Bhargavan Pillai v. State of Kerala
Indore Development Authority v. Shailendra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.