P. B. GAJENDRAGADKAR, T. L. VENKATARAMA AYYAR, S. K. DAS, B. P. SINHA, S. R. DASS
R. M. D. Chamarbaugwalla: Sharma Magazine, A Firm: Hind Shabda Rachana Harifai: Chaman Lal Khanna: Bannett Coleman And Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgement
VENKATARAMA AYYAR, J. - Pursuant to resolutions passed by the legislatures of several States under Art. 252 cl. (1) of the Constitution, Parliament enacted Prize Competitions Act, (42 of 1955), hereinafter referred to as the Act, and by a notification issued on 31-3-1956, the Central Government brought it into force on 1-4-1956. The petitioners before us are engaged in promoting and conducting prize competitions in different States of India, and they have filed the present petitions under Art. 32 questioning the validity of some of the provisions of the Act and the rules framed thereunder.
2. It will be convenient first to refer to the provisions of the Act and of the rules, so far as they are material for the purpose of the present petitions. The object of the legislation is, as stated in the short title and in the preamble, to provide for the control and regulation of prize competitions. Section 2 (d) of the Act defines prize competition as meaning any competition (whether called a cross-word prize competition, a missing-word prize competition, a picture prize competition or by any other name), in which prizes are offered for the solution of any puzzle based upon the
Relied on : Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar and other
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.