IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J.
Thadevoose Sebastian, S/o. Sebastian – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport - Respondent
WP(C) No. 15182 of 2021
Decided on : 30-09-2021
Constitution of India,1950 - Article 21 - Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 12(1)(a), (d) , 6 and - Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 406, 419 and 420 - Merchant or agent – Right to personal liberty - Whether pending crime must result in variation, impounding or revocation of passport or travel document - whether applicant is entitled to get a passport as well as period for which he is entitled to hold passport and court has also to keep in mind fact that pendency of a criminal case shall not stand in way or cause hindrance to decide future of an applicant –
Finding of the court : Court, stage of crime of Police Station, writ petition is ordered directing petitioner to approach jurisdictional Magistrate and obtain appropriate orders if final report has been filed and cognizance taken - On other hand, if final report has not been filed and cognizance not taken yet, there is no criminal proceeding pending and Passport Authority is free to decide grant of passport without permission from Magistrate. To enable passport authorities to process application filed bypetitioner for grant of a fresh passport, petitioner is given liberty to file his explanation to - Respondent shall pass appropriate orders within an outer period of four weeks thereafter - Parameters laid down as above are not exhaustive - While granting permission, criminal courts will do well to bear in mind that ultimate aim of granting permission is to balance competing claims of fundamental right to travel abroad and need to ensure presence of accused during trial. - Other reasonable safeguards to ensure presence of accused during trial can also be incorporated into order granting permission, Court circumstances warrant it –
Result : writ petition disposed of
JUDGMENT :
Petitioner challenges the communication issued by the Regional Passport Officer informing him of the short comings in his application for issuance of a passport. Reliefs are also sought for the issuance of a fresh passport in accordance with the circulars issued by the Government of India.
2. Petitioner was the holder of an Indian Passport bearing No. Z1969747 issued from Dubai and valid till 11.12.2020. It is alleged by the petitioner that, while he came for a visit to his hometown in April, 2012, he lost his passport within the premises of Nedumbassery Airport. The fact of loss of passport was intimated to the police station and he obtained a certificate dated 20.11.2012 from the police that no useful information have been received relating to the missing passport. Curiously, on the very same day petitioner received the certificate as mentioned above, an FIR was registered before the Ernakulam Rural Police Station against the petitioner as F.I.R. No.1480 dated 20.11.2012, alleging offences under sections 406, 419 and 420 of IPC apart from sections 12(1)(a), (d) of Passports Act, 1967. It was alleged in the crime that petitioner had impersonated the defacto complainant and travelled with the defacto complainant's passport on 10.10.2012 from Sharjah, after taking possession of the passport of the complainant by committing a breach of trust.
3. Petitioner contends that he had applied for a fresh passport on 26.11.2012, but since, in the meanwhile, the aforenoted crime was registered, petitioner was stuck in Kerala and has not returned back to Sharja till date. It is pleaded that by Ext.P5 dated 08.12.2014 petitioner was informed from the passport office that due to the adverse report on the pendency of the crime, the file for issuance of passport was closed.
4. Almost five years after the closure of the file relating to his application for issuance of passport, petitioner applied afresh, for a new passport, claiming that the police had dropped the proceedings against him. It is further alleged in the petition that even though a police clearance was issued, on 19.02.2020, Ext.P7 communication was issued by the 1st respondent intimating shortcomings in his application for the passport. Petitioner contends that despite having proper police clearance and despite the closure of the crime registered against him, the passport authorities are harassing him by referring to those false crimes.
5. The proceedings of this case on 30.07.2021 reflects that submissions were made on behalf of the petitioner that police had filed a closure report in the crime against the petitioner and hence he need not even get permission from the Magistrate's Court.
6. Contrary to the aforesaid, it is now submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the criminal case against the petitioner is still pending investigation and the submission on 30.07.2021 was incorrect and was an unfortunate instance of wrong instructions. According to the learned counsel, it is now reliably learnt that the police are yet to complete the investigation.
7. In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel, it is admitted that a crime is still pending against the petitioner but at the investigation stage. In the aforesaid circumstances, it may be apposite to consider the circumstances in which a passport can be denied to a citizen of India.
8. The Passports Act, 1967 (for short 'the Act') deals with the issuance of passports and regulating the departure of citizens of India to places outside the country. An application for obtaining a passport has to be submitted under section 5 of the Act while the refusal of a passport is dealt with under section 6 of the Act. Applicants for issuance of passport who are facing criminal proceedings are dealt with under section 6(2)(f) which reads as under:
(1) xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, the passport authority shall refuse to issue
Asok Kumar v. State of Kerala (2009 (2) KLT 712)
Mohamad Shafi v. Regional Passport Officer (2017 (2) KHC 484)
Muhammed v. Union of India and Others (2018 (4) KHC 945)
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Another [(1978) 1 SCC 248
Muhammed v. State of Kerala and Another (2012 (4) KHC 553)
Satwant Singh Sawhney v. D. Ramarathnam, Assistant Passport Officer
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.