P. V. KUNHIKRISHNAN
Radhakrishna Pillai S/o Gopinathan Pillai – Appellant
Versus
District Level Authorization Committee for Transplantation of Human Organs Ernakulam, Ernakulam Medical College Hospital – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
1. According to the District Level Authorization Committee for transplantation of Human Organs, Ernakulam, a person who came forward to donate his kidney to a needy patient cannot donate the same because he is involved in multiple criminal offences. I perused the entire provisions in Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 (for short ‘Act 1994’) and The Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Rules, 2014 (for short ‘Rules 2014’). I see no provision in the Act and Rules to support the stand of the respondent. The Government Pleader also conceded the same. If this stand of the respondent is allowed, I apprehend that, the respondent will reject such applications for permission to donate organs even on the ground that, the donor is a murderer, thief, rapist, or involved in minor criminal offences. I hope, they will not reject the applications because the donor is a Hindu, Christian, Muslim, Sikh, or person in a lower caste after comparing with the religion and caste of the recipient.
2. The short facts of the case are like this:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.