SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Ker) 1034

KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
Ranjith S/o Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Smt. Sherly S.A.
For the Respondent: Sri. Sanal P. Raj.

ORDER :

1. The accused is the revision petitioner. He challenges concurrent findings of guilt u/s 376 of IPC against him.

2. The victim and her mother, both illiterate, were residing at their residential house situated at Puliyamkulam, Parappa Village. Both of them were working as a coolie at a nearby quarry. The accused was working at a furniture shop situated near to the house of the victim. Admittedly the victim and the accused got acquainted and they fell in love eventually. They decided to marry. The prosecution allegation is that, one day in the third week of December 2009, at 11.00 p.m. the accused went to the house of the victim, had sex with her and made her pregnant on false promise of marriage.

3. The Vellarikkundu police registered crime against the accused on the basis of the First Information Statement (Ext.P1) given by the victim after three months of the alleged incident. After hearing both sides, the trial Court framed charge against the accused u/s 376 of IPC. He pleaded not guilty. After trial, the trial Court found the accused guilty u/s 376 of IPC, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- in default

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top