IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ.
State of Kerala – Petitioner
Versus
Radhakrishnan Nair G. S/o Gopalan Nair – Respondent
O.P. (KAT) No. 15 of 2022
Decided On : 23-02-2022
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Part Time service - Regularization of Service - Regularization as Regular Part-time Sweeper at the office of the Assistant Engineer - Duty of Advocate general.
Finding of the Court:
Eventuality where the learned Advocate General has already given opinion twice not to pursue the matter, then the officials concerned cannot directly dictate the further course of action and they will have to get specific sanction and approval from the Minister and a request will have to be made, showing cogent and convincing reasons, to the learned Advocate General through the Principal Secretary to Government of the Administrative Department concerned, for taking recourse to further action, as mentioned hereinabove. It has to be borne in mind that one of the main reasons for the huge pendency of arrears in various courts on account of Government litigations and unnecessary Government litigations has to be avoided to the extent possible, otherwise it would be highly detrimental to public interest as well as to the course of justice.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
1. The final order of the Tribunal at Ext.P-3 herein rendered on 01.07.2019 in the instant original application, O.A. No. 2014/2018 rendered by the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram Bench is under challenge before us in the original petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The respondents in the said O.A. are the petitioners in this O.P. and the sole applicant in the above O.A. has been arrayed as the sole respondent in this O.P.
2. The sole applicant in the O.A. has filed the instant Ext.P-1 original application, O.A. No. 2014/2018 before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram Bench with the following prayers:
(ii) To issue a further declaration that Annexure A9 government letter issued by the 1st respondent is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and against the spirit of Annexure A2 government order.
(iii) To issue a further declaration that Annexure A10 government circular is illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, against the very purpose of Annexure A2 government order, unsustainable and not applicable to the case of the applicant.
(iv) To call for the records leading upto Annexure A10 and set aside Annexure A9 and Annexure A10.
(v) To issue a direction, directing the respondent to regularize the service of the applicant as Regular Part-time Sweeper on the basis of Annexure A2 government order, at the office of the Assistant Engineer, PWD Road Section, Anchal, Kollam District, w.e.f. 18.06.2001, with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and other service benefits.
(vi) To issue such other orders as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in circumstances of this case and award exemplary cost of this proceedings to the petitioner.”
3. The Tribunal after hearing both sides has rendered the aforementioned impugned Ext.P-3 final order in the said O.A. on 01.07.2019, whereby the above O.A. has been finally disposed with the clear finding that the applicant herein is fully entitled for getting regularization as Part-Time Sweeper, in terms of para.8 of Annexure-A2 G.O. (P) No. 501/2005/Fin. dated 25.11.2005, with all consequential benefits. It is the abovesaid verdict of the Tribunal at Ext.P-3 herein that is under challenge in the above original petition filed at the instance of the State of Kerala and the departmental officers concerned.
4. Heard Sri. Asok M. Cherian, learned Additional Advocate General instructed and assisted by Sri. Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the petitioners in the OP/respondents in the O.A. and Sri. M.V. Thamban, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent in the OP/sole applicant in the O.A.
5. The original applicant has been engaged as Casual Sweeper in the office of the Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department (Road Section), Anchal, Kollam w.e.f. 01.11.1998 on a fixed monthly remuneration. The sweeping area of the said office premises, where the applicant has been employed as Sweeper was 102.94 Sq. M. at the relevant time, as can be seen from Annexure-A1 certificate issued by the Assistant Engineer of the Public Works Department (PWD). For compliance of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 18.06.2004 in W.P. (C) No. 30927/2003 and 47 other connected cases, the case in Mercy vs. State of Kerala, 2004 (2) KLT 848, was affirmed by the judgment dated 12.08.2005 of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A. No. 1863/2004 and connected cases. The competent authority of the State Government has framed a comprehensive scheme for regularization of such Casual Sweepers, as per Annexure-A2 G.O. (P) No. 501/2005/Fin. dated 25.11.2005. The main conditions for securing the benefit of regularization as p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.