SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ker) 269

S.MANIKUMAR, SUNIL THOMAS
Principal Secretary Food, Civil Supplies and Consumer Affairs Department – Appellant
Versus
S. Chandramohan Nair – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sri. Tek Chand.

JUDGMENT :

SUNIL THOMAS, J.

1. Respondent herein was an employee of the Kerala State Electricity Board, till his retirement from service on 1995. Thereafter, he practiced as a lawyer. While so, he was appointed as a member of the Kerala State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, by notification dated 25.06.2007, for a period of 5 years. He completed his tenure on 25.06.2012, and was relieved from the Commission with effect from 25.06.2012.

2. The appellant Government, issued a notification dated 28.11.2016, No. 175/2016/Fin, by which, members of statutory commissions other than the Government employees were granted the benefit of pension subject to completion of minimum tenure of 2 years. The benefit was extended to persons who were appointed to the Commission after 01.01.2006. Respondent claimed the benefit through his various communications. In the meanwhile, by Government Order No. 120/2020/P&ARD dated 04.05.2020, the benefit of pension was given to 25 named persons. It was reiterated that the benefit was extended only to persons who were appointed to statutory commissions after 01.01.2006 and who were not Government employees. However, the name of the respondent did not find a p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top