A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
Biji P. M. – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala Represented by Its Secretary, Taxes Department – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.
The applicants before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram in O.A.(EKM)Nos.1717/2016, 1853/2016, 342/2017, 239/2020 and 407/2020 are the petitioners before us, aggrieved by the common order dated 21.4.2021 of the Tribunal in the said O.A's. The petitioners were all Upper Division Clerks [UD Clerks]/Head Clerks working at various State Goods and Service Tax Offices, and they were aggrieved by the appointments contemplated to the post of Assistant State Tax Officer [ASTO] in the quota earmarked for by-transfer appointments from among qualified Stenographers and UD Typists.
2. As per the Special Rules in force, appointments to the post of ASTO were to be effected by direct recruitment and by transfer from among (i) UD Clerks and Head Clerks, (ii) Stenographers/Confidential Assistants and (iii) UD Typists in the ratio 30:1:1. It is stated by the petitioners that direct recruitment, as a method of recruitment for the post, was done away with during the year 1992 with retrospective effect from 1.1.1988, and that, at present, the recruitment to the post is only through by-transfer route from among the three streams mentioned above. W
Ravindran K. v. Mahatma Gandhi University and Others
Inder Parkash Gupta v. State of J & K and Others
Udayan v. Kerala Agro Machinery Corporation Ltd.
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd. and Others
Prem Singh and Others v. Haryana State Electricity Board and Others
Dr. Meera Massey (Mrs) and Others v. Dr. S.R. Mehrotra and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.