IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., J.
Tigi Christy Thomas, D/o. Late Thomas K. George - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Its Secretary, General Education Department & Ors. - Respondents
WP(C) Nos. 7009 & 2548 of 2021
Decided On : 30-06-2022
Kerala Education Act, 1959 - Post of HSST (Zoology) – Directions were issued to the lower authorities to prepare the seniority list of teachers under the 5th respondent and to take a decision on the by-transfer appointment of Smt.Susan George as HSST (Zoology) – Challenged – A candidate who participates in a selection process only accepts the procedure prescribed for the selection. But if there is a substantive defect in the selection process affecting her constitutional or statutory rights, nothing would preclude her from challenging the selection process. (Para 18)
Finding of the Court:
A candidate who participates in a selection process only accepts the procedure prescribed for the selection. But if there is a substantive defect in the selection process affecting her constitutional or statutory rights, nothing would preclude her from challenging the selection process.
Result: Writ petitions are disposed of
JUDGMENT :
Bishop Hodges Higher Secondary School, Mavelikkara, is an aided school managed by the Corporate Manager, CMS schools, and is governed by the provisions of the Kerala Education Act, 1959 and the Rules framed there under. These writ petitions have been filed by two claimants vying for the post of HSST (Zoology) under the 5th respondent management.
2. A thumbnail sketch of the facts are as under:
(b) However, the Manager, published a public notice calling for appointments after constituting a selection committee that included a Government nominee and Smt. Tigi Christy Thomas, the petitioner in W.P(C) No.7009 of 2021 was selected. In the HSST (Jr.) post, which occurred due to the promotion of Smt. Elizabeth Mathew, Smt. Stephy Stephen, the 7th respondent in W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021 was appointed.
(c) Smt. Susan George, on coming to know that Smt. Tigi and Smt. Stephy had been appointed and the proposal for approval had been forwarded to the Regional Deputy Director (RDD) submitted a representation contending that she was entitled to be appointed to the post ‘by transfer’.
(d) Pursuant to the directions issued by this Court in W.P.(C) No.17533 of 2019 the RDD, Chengannur, considered the matter and by order dated 20.9.2019 (Ext.P4 in W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021) took the view that Smt. Susan George is liable to be appointed under the by-transfer category and the Manager has illegally denied her right. The same view was taken by the RDD, HSE, Kottayam while issuing Ext.P4(a) order produced in W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021. Contending that the Manager was delaying the implementation of the orders passed by the RDD, Smt. Susan George submitted a representation before the Director General of Higher Secondary Education (DGE) and by Ext.P5 order dated 25.11.2019, produced in W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021, the DGE issued directions to the Manager to implement the same. Being aggrieved, the Manager preferred a revision petition before the Government. The Government after considering the entire aspects issued G.O.No.3352/2020/Gen.ED. dated 18.12.2020, finding that the 5th respondent has not maintained a proper seniority list of teachers under the Educational Agency and that Smt.Susan George is the seniormost HSA. Directions were issued to the lower authorities to prepare the seniority list of teachers under the 5th respondent and to take a decision on the by-transfer appointment of Smt.Susan George as HSST (Zoology).
3. It is in the above backdrop that these writ petitions have been preferred.
4. Smt.Susan George has approached this Court and has filed W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021 seeking implementation of directions issued by the Government.
5. Smt. Tigi Christy Thomas has preferred W.P.(C) No.7009 of 2021 challenging Ext.P8 order issued by the RDD and Ext.P10 order issued by the Government to the extent of issuing directions to appoint Smt. Susan George to the post of HSST (Zoology) and also for a declaration that the 6th respondent is estopped from raising the claim for appointment as she has participated in the selection process.
6. As common issues are involved, both the writ petitions are taken up and disposed of by a common judgment. Description of parties and exhibits shall be as detailed in W.P.(C) No.2548 of 2021 unless otherwise stated.
7. In the counter affidavit filed by the Manager, it is stated that Smt. Susan George is the senior-most fully qualified HSA under the management
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.