Back
ANU SIVARAMAN
Abeyson P John, S/o. PC John – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs :-
ii. Declare that the respondents 4 to 7 have no right to obstruct the petitioner from constructing his compound wall as per the Exhibit P1 permit and Exhibit P2 plan issued by the 2nd respondent.”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader as well as the learned counsel appearing for respondents 4 to 7.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the owner of 4.5 Ares of property in Block No.16 in Re-survey No.436/1-4 of Kidangoor Village, Meenachil Taluk, Kottayam District. It is submitted that the Secretary, Kidangoor Grama Panchayat had issued a site approval and building permit to the petitioner for construction of a compound wall for his residential property. It is submitted th
Duty of local authorities and police to protect property rights upon compliance with legal permissions.
Petitioner allowed to construct wall per permit; Municipality to facilitate building application.
Minor road land use for compound wall permissible with authority permission if public access unaffected.
The court affirmed the petitioner's right to construct a wall based on a valid permit, ruling that police protection is warranted against unwarranted obstruction.
A petition for mandamus regarding alleged encroachment on public land is not maintainable when an official revenue inspection report categorically concludes that no encroachment exists and the local ....
Conditions in building permits aimed at public water flow management are justifiable and must be adhered to by property owners.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
