MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
Aiswarya Granites – Appellant
Versus
Elamadu Grama Panchayat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J.
1. The petitioner submitted Ext.R1(a) application on 26.08.2022 for D&O license before the 2nd respondent, the Secretary of the 1st respondent Grama Panchayat. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent has not communicated any orders on the said application within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the application and therefore, the petitioner is entitled for deemed D&O license under Section 236(3) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act” for short).
2. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the 1st respondent wherein it is stated that after the receipt of the application for D&O license, since the application was found to be defective, the 2nd respondent addressed Ext.R1(d) letter to the Village Officer seeking certain clarifications with regard to the survey number of the property of the petitioner. It is stated that a copy of Ext.R1(d) was also served on the petitioner. It is contended that the same shall be construed as a communication within the ambit of Section 236(3) of the Act. It is further stated that the Panchayat committee as per Ext.R1(f) resolution dated 26.10.2022, has resolved to rej
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.