V. G. ARUN
Kainikkara Abdurahiman – Appellant
Versus
Aalukkal Yunus – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
V.G. ARUN, J.
1. The short question arising for consideration in this original petition is whether Ext.P1 is a bond or an agreement.
2. The petitioner filed O.S. No. 183 of 2013 before the Sub Court, Tirur for realisation of an amount of Rs. 11,20,000/- from the respondent, based on Ext.P1 document and a cheque dated 20.03.2013. In his written statement, the defendant/respondent contended that Ext.P1 is a bond and being insufficiently stamped, the document is liable to be impounded. Before commencement of trial, the court below considered the question as to the nature of the document. The petitioner contended that Ext.P1 is an agreement in terms of Article 5(C) of the Schedule attached to the Kerala Stamp Act, 1959 and hence, the stamp duty payable is only Rs. 50. The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the document is a bond as defined under Section 2(a) of the Kerala Stamp Act. By Ext.P4 order, the document is held to be a bond. Hence, the original petition.
3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner referred to Ext.P1 and contended that the terms and the wordings in Ext.P1 clearly reveals that it is intended to be an agreement. It is submitted that the parties themse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.