AMIT RAWAL
Akshay Raj, S/o. Senraj – Appellant
Versus
Ministry Of Law And Justice, Legislative Department, Represented By The Secretary, 4th Floor, A-Wing, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi, PIN – 110001 – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Seven original petitions i.e., OP MAC No.6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 17 of 2023 preferred against identical order dismissing the claim petition to be barred by limitation, involving common question of fact and law are being disposed off by common judgment. The main case is taken as O.P (MAC) No.6 of 2023.
2. O.P (MAC) No.6 of 2023 has been preferred against the order dated 30.11.2022 of the MACT, North Paravur dismissing the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the amended Motor Vehicles Act being barred by the limitation.
3. Petitioner, Akshay Raj, aged 26 years preferred a claim petition before the learned MACT on the ground that on 26.5.2022 while driving a motor vehicle bearing registration No.KL-P-42P 7106 at about 8.40 a.m. had met with an accident and suffered injuries, resulting into registration of FIR 590 of 2022. Learned MACT vide impugned order, dated 30.11.2022 rejected the claim application/petition simply on the ground that the claim petition was filed beyond the period of six months ie., on 28.11.2022 as the limitation expired on 25.11.2022. and thus there was a delay of almost three days. It is contended that the manner and the mode in which the order
Mukri Gopalan v. Cheppilat Puthanpurayil Aboobacker
M.P Steel Corporation v. Commissioner of Central Excise
Om Prakash v. Ashwani Kumar Bassi
Ganesan v. the Commissioner, the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Board and Ors.
Consolidated Engineering and enterprises v. Irrigation Dept. (2008) 7 SCC 169
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.