IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
Firozalavi T.V. S/o Ahammed Haji – Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
W.P. (Crl.) No. 72 of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 52-A, 20(b) II (c), 25, 29(1), 60(3), 61, 62, 63 - Vehicle transporting Narcotic Drug - Carrying contraband - Release Vehicle - Whether vehicle piloting or accompanying another vehicler which is transporting Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances to be held as vehicle used as conveyance in carrying contraband so as to confiscate same under Section 52-A of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Vehicle piloting or accompanying another vehicle transporting Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances cannot be held as vehicle used as conveyance in carrying contraband.
Findings of the Court:
Initially vehicle which carried contraband and accused Nos. 1 and 2 were arrested - Subsequently, accused Nos. 3 and 4 who alleged to have piloted vehicle by moving in front of vehicle were arrested and vehicle also taken into custody and according to prosecution same also is a subject matter of confiscation - Since vehicle involved in present case, cannot be held as a conveyance used in carrying any narcotic drug or psychotropic substances by interpreting Section 60(3) of NDPS Act, contention raised by learned Public Prosecutor to effect that vehicle bearing registration also is a subject matter of confiscation cannot be accepted - If so, vehicle is liable to be released on imposing appropriate conditions - In view of above, Ext.P5 order of Drug Disposal Committee stands set aside and car is ordered to be released to petitioner on conditions.
Result: Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
1. This writ petition (Criminal) has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, and the prayers herein are as under:
(II) Call for records leading to Exhibit P5 order issued by the Drug Disposal Committee and issue a writ of certiorari or such other writ, order or direction quashing the same.
(III) Issue any order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.”
2. A pertinent legal question to be decided is: whether vehicle piloting or accompanying another vehicle, which is transporting Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances to be held as vehicle used as conveyance in carrying the contraband so as to confiscate the same under Section 52-A of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act ?
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor representing the State.
4. The prosecution allegation in Crime No. 404/2021 of Pudukkad Police station is that, accused Nos. 1 to 4, with intention to make unlawful enrichment, brought 154.3 kilograms of Ganja from outside the State to Kerala State for the purpose of sale as part of conspiracy hatched between them at Dream Stay lodge. The further allegation is that, the 3rd accused who brought KL-58-T-2312 tempo van from its RC owner for rent had kept Ganja in special racks made in the tempo van and transported the same to Kerala from outside Kerala.
5. The prosecution would allege further that, while the 1st accused was transporting the Ganja in the tempo van bearing registration No. KL-58-T-2312 along with the 2nd accused, the 3rd and 4th accused had given pilot to the said vehicle by traveling in a car bearing registration No. KL-65-L-3810 from Valayar, Palakkad towards Kerala and the contraband seized at about 14.15 hours on 01.08.2021, when they reached near Paliyekkara Toll Plaza. Accordingly, accused Nos. 1 and 2 were arrested along with the contraband and the tempo van bearing registration No. KL-58-T-2312 and the contraband were seized by the Police. Thereafter accused Nos. 3 and 4 were also arrested and the car bearing registration No. KL-65-L-3810 was taken into custody, on the allegation that accused Nos. 3 and 4 given pilot to the vehicle bearing registration No. KL-58-T-2312. In this matter, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 20(b) II(c), 25 and 29(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred as ‘NDPS Act’ for short).
6. When the petitioner herein, who is the RC owner of car bearing registration No. KL-65-L-3810, moved an application before the Drugs Disposal Committee, claiming that the vehicle had no involvement in the crime on the specific assertion that the prosecution records would not justify transport of contraband in the said vehicle, the Drugs Disposal Committee, as per the order dated 06.11.2021 rejected the said contention as per Ext.P5 order. It is in this context, the petitioner has approached this Court for the above reliefs.
7. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the petitioner who is the RC owner of the car bearing registration No. KL-65-L-3810 has no involvement in the said crime. Further, the prosecution has no case that the contraband was seized from this car while using the same as conveyance to transport the contraband.
8. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, as per Section 60(3) of the NDPS Act, conveyance or vehicle used in carrying any narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances shall alone be liable to be confiscated. He also would submit that, the prosecution has no case that the contraband was carried in the car bearing registration No. KL-65-L-3810 or the same was used as a conveyance to carry the contraband. Theref
Smart Logistics (M/s), Kozhikode vs. State of Kerala and Others
Section 60(3) of the NDPS Act provides that any conveyance or vehicle used in carrying any Narcotic Drugs or Psychotropic Substances shall be liable to confiscation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petition under Section 451 of Cr.P.C for return of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act is not maintainable, and the special procedure for ....
Interim custody of a vehicle seized under the NDPS Act should not be encumbered by onerous conditions like bank guarantees when there is no allegation of the vehicle being used for transporting contr....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the authority of the court to decide on the confiscation of a vehicle used in carrying narcotic drugs or substances at the conclusion of the tri....
Vehicle seizure under NDPS Act requires evidence of direct use for drug transport.
A vehicle cannot be confiscated without proving its use in drug transport with the owner's knowledge.
The interpretation of statutory provisions, such as Section 60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, and the strict requirement for the vehicle to be used in carrying the contr....
Court establishes that interim custody of a seized vehicle requires proof of ownership knowledge of its use in a drug-related crime.
The court clarified that the jurisdictional court has the authority to grant interim custody of vehicles seized under the NDPS Act, overriding the Drug Disposal Committee's decision.
If vehicle is a subject matter of confiscation, power of Court to consider a claim under Section 451 of Cr.P.C. stands denuded.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.