SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 204

N. NAGARESH
J & S Granites Company – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Respondent: SMT.VIDYA KURIAKOSE, GOVERNMENT PLEADER

JUDGMENT :

When a Partnership Firm has submitted application for Mining Lease, whether the competent authority to process the application can refuse to do so on the ground that the Explosives Licence produced in support of the Quarrying Lease has been issued in the name of one of the Partners of the Firm and not in the name of the Firm. This is the common question arising in these three writ petitions filed by three different Partnership Firms.

2. W.P.(C) No.32433 of 2022 has been filed by a Partnership Firm represented by its Managing Partner Sri.K.Sadanandan. The petitioner-Firm was issued with a Letter of Intent in the name of the Firm for starting a Quarry.

The petitioner has obtained all requisite statutory Licences, Permits and Consent so as to make the petitioner eligible for Quarrying Lease. Ext.P3 Explosives Licence under the Explosives Rules has been issued in the name of “Shri. K.Sadanandan”. By Ext.P4 letter, the Director, Mining and Geology has informed the Geologist that as and when an Explosives Licence issued in the name of the Partnership Firm is produced, the application for Mining Lease would be processed.

3. More or less similar are the facts in W.P.(C) Nos.34797 an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top