SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Ker) 390

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R. RAVI, J.
Mohammed Sageer S/o Abdul Huq – Petitioner
Versus
Kannambra Grama Panchayath – Respondent
W.P. (C) No. 30771 of 2021, W.P. (C) No. 2580 of 2022
Decided On : 16-03-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Renjith Thampan, V.M. Krishnakumar, P.R. Reena.
For the Respondent: Brijesh Mohan, R. Rajpradeep, Jayasree K.P.

Headnote:

Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 - Sections 5 and 6 - Whether a land assigned for industrial purpose can be alienated - Decision does not apply to situation on hand - Held, Petitioner has relied on decision to submit that even if respondents have obtained an acknowledgment certificate Facilitation Act they necessarily have to obtain licenses from Panchayat - for erecting a hotmix plant, there is a necessity to obtain a building permit - When the said judgment was rendered, the Facilitation Act had not come into force and the Division Bench did not have an occasion to consider the effect of the Act - A permission under Rule 68 alone is required from the Secretary and if the period of installation exceeds six months, the applicant will have to secure necessary permits/permission under the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act - Even though a contention had been raised on the basis of the certificate obtained under the Facilitation Act, the Division Bench did not consider the issue on merits - Petition Disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

T.R. RAVI, J.

1. Whether a hot mix plant set up by the petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 30771 of 2021 should be allowed to function, is the hotly contested issue in these writ petitions.

FACTS:

2. W.P. (C) No. 30771/2021: The petitioner and his brother, who are PWD contractors entered into agreements with the Public Works Department and the Local Self Government Institutions for construction, improvement, repair works, etc. of PWD and Local Self Government Institutions. They are also involved in road laying works. To carry out the contract works under the Government, a large quantity of metal bitumen mix is required. To source the said requirement, the petitioner decided to install a metal bitumen mix plant. An extent of 1 Acre of land in Sy.No. 378/1 of Kannambra Village was purchased. An application was filed under the Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as Facilitation Act) to the District Industries Centre, Palakkad, (DIC for short) in the prescribed form, seeking an acknowledgment certificate for starting the manufacture of metal bitumen mix unit in the property. Ext.P3 certificate was issued on 8.12.2021. Ext.P4 dated 26.10.2021 is the intimation regarding the online industry registration certificate. The very purpose of the Facilitation Act is to ensure that there are no roadblocks while starting industries and establishments in the State of Kerala. Based on Exts.P3 and P4, the petitioner started preparation for establishing the unit. It is alleged that there were threats from some local leaders of a major ruling political party, that the petitioner would not be permitted to function the unit if persons chosen by the obstructors were not engaged in the petitioners’ establishment. The petitioner filed W.P. (C) No. 29309/2021 and by Ext.P5 interim order dated 17.12.2021, this Court directed the Sub Inspector of Police, Vadakkencherry Police Station to afford adequate and effective protection to the petitioner and his employees, if the petitioner was functioning with valid consents and licenses from the competent statutory authorities. Apprehending issuance of stop memo by the 1st respondent Panchayat, since the petitioner had not obtained a building permit from the Panchayat, the petitioner has moved this writ petition. The petitioner contends that in view of the provisions of the Facilitation Act, there is no necessity for obtaining such permits from the Local Authorities for a period of three years. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the establishment of the petitioner's metal bitumen mix unit on the strength of Exts.P3 and P4 and to declare that the petitioner is entitled to establish the Unit in view of Sections 5 and 6 of the Facilitation Act.

3. W.P. (C) No. 2580/2022: The petitioners in this writ petition are owners of rubber plantations and residents of Kannambra Grama Panchayat. They submit that the rubber plantations owned by them were originally part of Arya Lakshmi Rubber Estate and that the 11th and 12th respondents in the writ petition are owners of rubber plantations adjacent to the estate of the petitioners. The 12th respondent referred to above is the petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 30771 of 2021 and the 11th respondent is his brother. The petitioners have challenged the erection of the tar mixing plant in the properties of the 11th and 12th respondents. They submit that the property was originally a rubber plantation which was cleared and levelled by using a JCB and thereafter the plant was installed. The above action is challenged on the following grounds:

(A) The area is densely populated and has schools, anganwadis, and Madrassa.

(B) Two residential houses belonging to the petitioner are situated within 50 metres radius, and there are 50 residential houses within a 200 metres radius of the plant. It is also stated that there are 800 houses within a radius of 500 metres from the plant.

(C) The tar mixing plant has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top