ANIL K. NARENDRAN, A. BADHARUDEEN
Nirmala, W/o. Gopinathan – Appellant
Versus
Sundaresan (Deceased), S/o. Kochu Velu – Respondent
A non-decree holder affected by a court sale can challenge it under Order XXI Rule 90 if there is material irregularity or fraud (!) (!) . Fraud must be pleaded and proved; mere allegations are insufficient (!) (!) . The challenge must be filed within 60 days from the date of sale or from when the applicant becomes aware of the sale or fraud; this period cannot be extended solely due to concealment (!) (!) . The application is barred if filed after the limitation period. Challenging the sale requires demonstrating substantial injury or injustice caused by irregularity or fraud, not merely alleging collusion or low sale price (!) (!) .
JUDGMENT :
A.BADHARUDEEN, J.
This appeal sprang up from the order in E.A.No.77/2014 in E.P.No.8/2008 in O.S.82/2004 on the files of the Sub Court, Attingal. The appellants are the legal representatives of one Gopinathan, S/o.Padmanabhan, who originally filed E.A.No.77/2014 as a third party seeking the relief to set aside the sale conducted in E.P.No.8/2008 in O.S.No.82/2004 on 14.06.2010 and confirmed on 16.08.2010.
2. The respondents herein are the decree holder/auction purchaser and the judgment debtors in the above E.P. During pendency of this appeal, the 1st respondent died and his legal heirs got impleaded as additional respondents 5 and 6.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel appearing for the 1st respondent in detail. Perused the lower court records and the relevant decisions on the point, including the decisions placed by both sides.
4. Shown off unnecessary embellishments, the facts of the case are as under:
Sundareshan, the 1st respondent herein filed Suit -O.S.No.82/2004, before the Sub Court, Attingal and obtained decree to realise an amount of Rs.1,44,450/-with 6% interest from respondents 2 to 4 herein on 31.05.2007. The property ha
A.A.Joseph v. Varghese George 1986 KLT 351 : 1986 KLJ 132
Boban v. Sajith Kumar & another 2004 (1) KLJ 153 : ILR 2004 (1) Ker. 113
Desh Bandhu Gupta v. N.L.Anand & Rajinder Singh 1994 1 SCC 131
Gnan Das v. Paulin Moraes 1998 (2) KLT 88
Govindan Master v. Janaki V. & others 2011 (3) KHC 581 : 2011 (3) KLT 837
Jayarajan K. & others v. Sambasivan 2022 (1) KLJ 789 : 2022 (2) KLT 624
Jayan Kuttichakk v. Common Man Chitties and Loan (Pvt.) Ltd.
Nani Gopal Paul v. T.Prasad Singh & others AIR 1995 SC 1971
P.K.Kuruvila v. Corporation Bank 2008 (1) KHC 258 : 2008 (1) KLT 604
Pailee v. Krishna Panicker AIR 1971 Ker 331
Rattan Singh & others v. Nirmal Gill & others AIR 2021 SC 899
S.Noorden v. Thiru Venkita Reddiar
Siddagangaiah (D) Thr. Lrs. v. N.K.Giriraja Shetty (D) Thr. Lrs.
Superior Bank Ltd. v. Budh Singh 1924 (22) ALL LJ 413 ; Akshia v. Govindarajulu (1924) 47 MLJ 549 .
Thomas v. Devassy 1998 (2) KLT 1078
Unnikrishnan & others v. Kunhibeevi & others 2011 (1) KHC 352
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.