IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
Alfa One Global Builders Pvt. Ltd. – Petitioner
Versus
Nirmala Padmanabhan W/o Raghunathu T. Pillai – Respondent
W.P. (Crl.) No. 1196 of 2022
Decided On : 21-08-2023
Negotiable Instruments Act - Section 138 and - 142(2) (a) - Agreement - Cheque Dishonoured - Lack of Jurisdiction - Whether court, where cheque was presented for collection, has jurisdiction to entertain complaint, alleging commission of offence under Section 138 of the NI Act - Challenge raised by learned counsel for petitioners referring definition of the word ‘delivered’ contemplated under Section 46 of NI Act could not succeed.
Findings of the Court:
It is pertinent to observe that when question of jurisdiction to be decided, said challenge should be raised before same court and said court has jurisdiction to decide question of jurisdiction and question of jurisdiction never be a subject matter of challenge in a writ petition - Legal question is answered, in interest of justice and to avoid multiplicity of proceedings.
Result: Petition dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
A. BADHARUDEEN, J.
1. This writ petition is at the instance of accused Nos. 1 and 3 in C.C. No. 290/2022 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Chengannur.
2. The respondents herein are the complainant as well as accused Nos.2 and 4, in the above case.
3. The writ petitioners seek the following reliefs:
(ii) Declare that the jurisdiction to entertain the Complaint under Sec. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is a Special Jurisdiction conferred by Sec. 142 of the NI Act, Notwithstanding anything contained in Criminal Procedure Code, must be strictly construed and only the Court Specified in Sec. 142(2) alone shall have the jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.
(iii) Declare that the dispute between the Complainant, Writ petitioners and Respondents 2 & 3 are Civil Disputes arising out of Exhibit-P2, agreement for Specific Performance of Construction of Commercial Building in immovable property and the delay in performing the act agreed will only entail the civil consequences.
(iv) Declare that the liability under the Cheque and NI Act proceedings taken over by the contracting parties, Respondents 2 & 3 the proceedings against the petitioners who are erstwhile partners is not maintainable.
(v) That by virtue of the agreement between the Complainant and Accused, mediation and Arbitration are provided in the agreement and criminal prosecution is not contemplated with respect to any dispute arising and incidental to the rights arising under the agreement.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents.
5. I have perused the relevant records and provisions of law in this connection.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioners argued at length, to convince this Court that Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Chengannur, lacks jurisdiction to entertain Ext.P3 complaint, as per which, the complainant launched prosecution, alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the NI Act’ hereinafter), by the accused. In support of this contention, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that, as per Ext.P3, copy of the complaint, the address of the complainant is shown as ‘Deepam House, Thayineri, Payyannur Village, Kannur District.’ At the same time, in Ext.P3, it has been stated that ‘Now residing at “Pournami” Thriperumthura P.O. Mavelikkara, Alappuzha.’ It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that, the cheque amount involved in the complaint is Rs.1,41,48,939/- (Rupees One Crore Forty One Lakh Forty Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty Nine only) and the said cheque was issued, pursuant to an agreement entered into between the petitioners and partners of the firm ‘M/s Thana Square’ and the complainant. Ext.P2 is the copy of the said agreement. In the said agreement, the address of the complainant is shown as ‘Mrs. Nirmala Padmanabhan, W/o Mr. Padmanabhan, permanently residing at ‘601, Saishubham BLD Plot No. 7, Sec.8B.C.B.D, Belapur, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra State, India.’ It is also submitted that the cheque was delivered at Kannur by the petitioners, drawn on South Indian Bank Ltd., Kannur.
7. The sum and substance of the argument tendered by the learned counsel for the petitioners is that, since the cheque was delivered for collection through an account maintained by the drawer of the cheque at Kannur, the complainant at present residing within the jurisdiction of Chengannur Court, could not launch prosecution before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Chengannur, merely on the ground that the cheque was presented for collection through State Bank of India, Chennithala branch, Alappuzha District, within the jurisdiction of Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-1, Chengannur. It is arg
K. Bhaskaran vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra and Another
Court within whose jurisdiction branch of the bank where the payee maintains the account is situated, will have jurisdiction to try offence, if the cheque is delivered for collection through an accou....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the trial court had jurisdiction to try the case under Section 138 of NI Act based on the location of the complainant's bank branch, and the i....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the clarification of territorial jurisdiction for trying an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as per the amendment....
Section 142 (2) of Negotiable Instruments Act read cognizance of offences.
(1) Dishonour of cheque – Jurisdiction to try complaint filed under Section 138 in respect of cheque delivered for collection through an account payee cheque, is vested in court within whose local ju....
Jurisdiction for offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is determined by the location of the bank where the cheque is presented for collection.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.