SOPHY THOMAS
Shijo Das, S/o. Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by the Public Prosecutor – Respondent
ORDER :
This revision is at the instance of the 1st accused in SC No.79 of 2011 on the file of Assistant Sessions Judge, Thiruvalla, assailing the judgment in Crl. Appeal No.152 of 2012 on the file of Additional District and Sessions Judge (Ad hoc) Court-I, Pathanamthitta, which upheld his conviction and sentence under Sections 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari Act.
2. Prosecution case is that, on 01.07.2007, at about 8.25 a.m., the revision petitioner was found carrying a 5 litre black can containing 4.5 litres of illicit arrack, and the 2nd accused was found following him. PW1, the preventive officer, and excise party detected the offence. On seeing the excise party, the 2nd accused ran away, and so, he could not be arrested. PW1 arrested the revision petitioner, seized the contraband and prepared arrest memo, seizure mahazar etc. PW3 registered the crime, investigated the case and laid charge against the revision petitioner and the 2nd accused under Sections 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act. The 2nd accused was absconding and so, his case was split up and re-filed by the trial court.
3. The trial court framed charge against the revision petitioner under Section 8(1) and 8(2) of the Abkari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.