Kerala HC Issues Notice to Digi Yatra Foundation in PIL Seeking Strict Compliance with DPDP Act 2023 for Airport Passenger Data: High Court of Kerala
07 Mar 2026
Appointment to Higher Post on Compassionate Grounds Not a Matter of Right: J&K&L High Court
07 Mar 2026
Nearly Decade-Long Delay in Patnitop Illegal Construction PIL Appalls J&K&L High Court; Directs PDA CEO to Join Proceedings
07 Mar 2026
Punjab & Haryana HC Denies Anticipatory Bail in Murder via Humiliation Case: Sections 103(1) & 3(5) BNS
07 Mar 2026
Employees Under CCS Pension Rules Excluded from PG Act Section 2(e) Gratuity: Delhi HC Upholds Forfeiture on Resignation
07 Mar 2026
Security Deposit Forfeiture Without Show-Cause Notice Violates Natural Justice: Himachal Pradesh High Court
07 Mar 2026
S.202 CrPC Inquiry Not Mandatory for Public Servant Complaints If Accused Outside Jurisdiction: Supreme Court
09 Mar 2026
Professor MP Singh: Shaper of Constitutional Discourse
09 Mar 2026
CJI Kant: Action Needed for More Women Judges
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Travancore Cocotuft Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner (Customs) – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
1 All these four petitions involve common question of facts and law. Therefore, they are being decided together after having been heard.
W.P.(C) Nos.5394/2024, 4670/2024 and 12195 of 2024
2. Sri K.Srikumar, Senior Advocate assisted by Adv.M.Balagopal addressed the arguments in WPC Nos.5394 of 2024 and 12195 of 2024 whereas in Writ Petition (c) No.6090/2024, Sri.Anil D.Nair, Senior Advocate and in WPC No.6090 of 2024 Smt.Ammu Charles.
3. Brief facts of each Writ Petitions which are relevant for the purposes of deciding the writ petitions are noted hereunder:
WPC No.5394 of 2024
3.1 The petitioner, a Partnership firm, is engaged in the business of manufacture and export of mats, mattings, other floor coverings of coir and other textile materials. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the CGST/IGST Act and Rules made thereunder. The petitioner would import raw materials for the purpose of exporting finished goods under Advanced Authorisation Scheme. Under the said Scheme, an exporter is entitled to import inputs by claiming
The Customs authorities have the power and jurisdiction to make corrections of any clerical or arithmetical mistakes or errors arising in any decision or order due to any accidental slip or omission ....
The court affirmed that demand notices for IGST short payment are valid under the Customs Act, despite claimed bona fide mis-declaration, as there were no supporting documents for amending the bill o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the amendment sought by the appellant in the shipping bills of entry was liable to be allowed since only a declaration was sought by the Appel....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the provisions of the GST Act allow for rectification of inadvertent errors in GST returns when there is no loss of revenue to the government,....
The court affirmed that amendments to Bill of Entry under Section 149 of the Customs Act are permissible based on existing documentation, irrespective of the timing of mis-declaration disclosure.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article