AMIT RAWAL, C. S. SUDHA
V. T. Radha, W/O Late Kunhiraman Nair – Appellant
Versus
Chairman & Managing Director South Malabar Gramin Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
C.S. Sudha, J.
This intra court appeal filed by the first respondent in W.P. (C)No.27110/2013 challenges the judgment dated 16/10/2017 allowing the writ petition. The respondents herein are the petitioner and respondents 2 and 3 respectively in the writ petition. The parties and the documents will be referred to as described in the writ petition.
2. The petitioner is a bank constituted under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. The first respondent was employed on commission basis by the petitioner bank as 'Nithya Nidhi Deposit' agent for the purpose of mobilising deposits under the 'Nithya Nidhi Deposit Scheme'. The first respondent worked for the petitioner bank as per the agreements/contracts entered into from time to time for a period of about 30 years from 01/02/1979 to 24/03/2009. The first respondent was drawing a commission of Rs.8,000/-when he left the services of the petitioner bank. Pursuant there to, he preferred a claim for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (the Gratuity Act). The controlling authority as per Ext.P1 order dated 14/11/2012 taking note of the long years of service rendered by the first respondent and relying on the dictum in Indian
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.