Amendments allowing Local Self Government Institutions to approve religious constructions do not delegate essential sovereign functions and maintain necessary oversight to ensure public order and community harmony.

The 1st petitioner is a Constituent Parish Church of the Malankara Orthodox Church administered under the 1934 Constitution of the Malankara Church and the 2nd petitioner is the Vicar of the 1st petitioner Church. The petitioners represent the Orthodox (Catholicos) faction of the Malankara Church and the party respondents represent the Patriarch (Jacobite) faction. There were perpetual fight for managing the affairs of the Malankara Church between the two factions. The Hon'ble Supreme Court, in Varghese K.S. and Others v. St. Peter's & Paul's Syrian Orthodox Church and Others [(2017) 15 SCC 333: 2017 (3) KLT 261 : 2017 KHC 6531], held that all churches under the Malankara Syrian Church will have to be administered in accordance with the 1934 Constitution. It is stated by the petitioners that although the judgment in Varghese K.S. (supra) would govern the parties with respect to the Malankara Church, the Patriarch faction violated the directions therein and denied the rights of Vicars and others appointed in accordance with the 1934 Constitution to carry out religious services. This led to disturbance and disharmony among parishioners, prompting the filing of petitions for police protection. This Court, in Ext. P3 judgment, observing that in light of the fact that the Patriarch faction is bent on flouting the rule of law and creating an atmosphere of hostility and animosity among parishioners, directed the police to afford protection to the Vicars and Clergies appointed under the 1934 Constitution to conduct religious services in the St. Peter's and St. Paul's Orthodox Syrian Church, Chalisserry.

2. While so, the predecessor of the 2nd petitioner got information that the Jacobite faction is going to construct a new religious place/church in a property adjacent to St. Peter's and St. Paul's Orthodox Syrian Church, Chalisserry and its parish hall and quarters. On enquiry, it was revealed that the 5th respondent had submitted an application before the 3rd respondent, Chalissery panchayat for the construction of a church on behalf of the Jacobite faction under the Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019 and the panchayat has, by Ext. P4, resolved that since the application pertains to church/religious place, permission of the District Collector is required and therefore, the panchayat committee has entrusted the 4th respondent, the Secretary to make necessary application for the same.

3. On coming to know about the said decision, the predecessor of the 2nd petitioner submitted Ext. P5 complaint before the District Collector with respect to the proposed construction of the new church adjacent to the 1st petitioner Church. Ext. P5 complaint was made over to the 4th respondent Secretary along with Ext. P6 covering letter by the District Collector. While so, the 4th respondent issued Ext. P7 letter stating that though, 5th respondent's application seeking permission for construction of the church was forwarded for the permission of the District Collector, it was returned by the District Collector in view of the directions in G.O (P) No.19/2021/Home dated 14.02.2021 (Ext. P11) holding that as per the amendment br