IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.Muhamed Mustaque, Shoba Annamma Eapen, JJ.
Mini Varghese - Petitioner
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented By Its Principal Secretary To Government, General Education Department And Ors. – Respondent
OP(KAT) NO. 64 OF 2024
Decided On : 22-05-2024
General Transfer - Teacher Transfer - Ext.P4 General Transfer norms - Clauses (iv) and (v) - GLPS, Thevannoor - GLPS, Anchal - GUPS, Padinjattinkara
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a teacher, was transferred to Anchal GLPS, her fifth option, but later requested a transfer to GLPS, Thevannoor, her first option, due to her husband's illness. The government transferred her to GLPS, Thevannoor, but later cancelled the transfer and reinstated another teacher at the same school.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioner, being senior to the other teacher, was entitled to a transfer to her first opted station, GLPS, Thevannoor, based on compassionate grounds and the General Transfer norms.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner, as a senior teacher, was entitled to a transfer to her first opted station, GLPS, Thevannoor, on compassionate grounds.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioner, being senior and having chosen GLPS, Thevannoor as her first option, was entitled to priority for transfer based on compassionate grounds and the General Transfer norms.
Final Decision: The impugned order and the government order were set aside, and the appropriate authority was directed to give a posting to the petitioner at GLPS, Thevannoor. The official respondents were also directed to consider a posting for the other teacher in a nearer station than GUPS, Padinjattinkara, when a vacancy arises.
JUDGMENT :
Shoba Annamma Eapen, J.
This original petition is filed by the applicant before the Kerala Administrative Tribunal challenging Ext.P3 order of the tribunal dated 25.01.2024 in OA No.1817 of 2023.
2. The petitioner/applicant entered service on 04.02.2004 and was posted at UPS, Kadakkal, Kollam. She filed an application for General Transfer for teachers in the year 2023-24 and was transferred to Anchal GLPS, which was her fifth option. She joined Anchal GLPS on 08.06.2023. While so, a vacancy arose on 26.06.2023 at GLPS, Thevannoor, which was her first option. On coming to know about the vacancy at GLPS, Thevannoor, the petitioner submitted Annex.A2 and A3 requests to the Deputy Director of Education on 27.06.2023 and 05.07.2023 respectively for transfer to GLPS, Thevannoor. Thereafter, as per Annex.A4 order dated 24.07.2023, the petitioner was transferred to GLPS, Thevannoor. While so, the fourth respondent herein challenged Annex.A4 in OA No.1398 of 2023, wherein the tribunal directed the State to consider the representation of the fourth respondent. Thereafter, as per Annex.A8 order dated 10.10.2023, the second respondent was directed to cancel Annex.A4 order and to reinstate the fourth respondent at GLPS, Thevannoor. The grievance highlighted by the petitioner was that while issuing Annex.A8 order, the first respondent did not consider the genuine grounds raised by the petitioner that her husband is suffering from cancer and undergoing treatment at the Regional Cancer Centre (RCC), Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner also preferred Annex.A10 representation against Annex.A8 order. It was aggrieved by the issuance of Annex.A8 order, the petitioner approached the tribunal. The tribunal, after considering the issue, disposed of the original application directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for a posting in a more nearer station. Challenging this, the petitioner is before us.
3. We have heard the learned counsel on both sides.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner, who entered service on 04.02.2004, was promoted as HM in RGM LP School, Cherukara on 19.07.2022. The opted stations of the petitioner are as follows;
i. GLPS, Thevannoor under AEO, Veliyam
ii. Ayur GLPS under AEO, Anchal
iii. Ayur JUPS under AEO, Anchal
iv. St.Thomas GLPS, Thrippallaziyam under AEO, Veliyam
v. Anchal GLPS under AEO, Anchal
vi. GLPS, Ummannoor under AEO, Veliyam
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was transferred to the fifth opted station, Anchal GLPS under AEO, Anchal. At the time of transfer as above, there was no vacancy at GLPS, Thevannoor. While so, an open vacancy occurred at GLPS, Thevannoor, on 26.06.2023, which is the first opted station of the petitioner. The learned counsel pointed out that in terms of Clause 5 of Ext.P4 transfer norms, if an employee has got posting into his/her second and third option, his/her better option would not be cancelled and he/she ought to be accommodated against the better opted station in the event of occurrence of vacancy in the meanwhile. According to the learned counsel, the petitioner being the senior teacher, the second respondent was right in issuing Annex.A4 transfer order, whereas the issuance of Annex.A8 order is in violation of the General Transfer norms. It is further submitted that the husband of the petitioner is suffering from cancer and is undergoing treatment at RCC, Thiruvananthapuram; and that is the reason why the petitioner had given her first option as GLPS, Thevannoor. It is pointed out that the fourth respondent, who is junior to the petitioner, was temporarily appointed in the GLPS, Thevannoor, as HM. It is further pointed out that it is noting that the husband of the fourth respondent is suffering from cancer, the government had given a posting to the fourth respondent at GLPS, Thevannoor, on compassionate grounds. The learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is also entitled for getting t
AI
The main legal point established is that seniority and compassionate grounds, as per the General Transfer norms, should be considered in teacher transfers, entitling the senior teacher to priority fo....
Transfers upheld using station seniority for second tenures; limited judicial review in posting disputes prioritizing organizational needs.
Transfer policies must prioritize service exigencies while considering personal circumstances without conferring a vested right to particular postings.
Transfer orders must be based on administrative feasibility, and personal hardships do not guarantee entitlement if guidelines are appropriately followed.
Point of law: As a disciplined employee, the petitioner has obeyed the said orders under protest and he has joined duties at the place of transfer though he is BLIND and though the impugned order is ....
Judicial interference in employee transfers limited unless mala fide or statutory violation; administrative guidelines not enforceable rights.
Transfer orders in public service must be made based on administrative necessity and public interest, and cannot be influenced by political pressure or arbitrary decisions.
Transfer orders in government service must be made in public interest and administrative exigencies, and modifications to such orders require valid justification; courts will not interfere unless the....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.