A. BADHARUDEEN
Aswathy K. P. @ Aswathy – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Kerala, Ernakulam – Respondent
ORDER :
This Revision petition under Section 397 r/w 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter), has been filed by the accused in SC.No.677/2019 on the files of Assistant Sessions Court, Irinjalakuda.
2. The revision petitioner impugns order in Crl.M.P.No.99/2023 in the above case dated 13.02.2024, whereby the learned Assistant Sessions Judge allowed an application filed by the learned Public Prosecutor under Section 216 of Cr.P.C., to alter the charge for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘IPC’ hereinafter), after altering earlier charge framed, alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 304 of IPC.
3. It is argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after framing charge under Sections 304 and 309 of IPC, trial started and PWs 1 to 5 were examined. Thereafter, relying on the evidence given by PW5, the court, acting on the application filed by the prosecution under Section 216 Cr.P.C, altered the charge. It is submitted that the prosecution has no right to seek alteration of charge though it is permissible at the volition of the court. The learned counsel placed decision of this Court repo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.