IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Badharudeen, J.
Shyju – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor and Ors. – Respondents
CRL.MC No. 7310 of 2022
Decided On : 26-06-2024
JJ Act - Quashing of Proceedings - Offence under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, the 2nd accused, sought to quash the proceedings against him under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging that he had no custody or control over the minor children involved in the case.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the provisions of Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act and concluded that the petitioner did not come under the purview of a person having actual charge or control over the children, and therefore, no offence under Section 75 of the JJ Act would attract against the petitioner.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner could be held liable for an offence under Section 75 of the JJ Act, given that he had no custody or control over the minor children involved.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 75 of the JJ Act and held that in order to attract an offence under this section, the offender should have actual charge or control over the child, which the petitioner did not have in this case.
Final Decision: The Criminal Miscellaneous Case was allowed, and all further proceedings against the petitioner under C.C.No.242/2022 were quashed.
ORDER :
This Criminal Miscellaneous Case has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, by the petitioner, who is the 2nd accused in Crime No.222/2022 of Valiyamala Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram and the prayer herein is as under:
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor. I have perused the relevant documents.
3. In this matter, prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Sections 109 and 317 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short, ‘the JJ Act’ hereinafter), by accused Nos.1 and 2.
4. The prosecution allegation is that, the 1st accused in this crime is the mother of two minor children, aged 12 and 11. The 1st accused was residing along with her parents and children. The husband of the 1st accused (the additional 3rd respondent herein) has been working in Abudhabi and when he came back to the house of the 1st accused, it was noticed that the 1st accused eloped with the petitioner herein, by leaving the minor children with her parents. It is alleged that, it was because of the instigation of the petitioner herein, the 1st accused committed the above crime.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that, no materials, prima facie, made out to attract offence punishable under Section 75 of the JJ Act, against the petitioner herein, since he has no custody or control over the minor children and the minor children were left at the house of the parents of the 1st accused/mother, by the 1st accused. Therefore, the further proceedings against the petitioner herein, as sought for, are liable to be quashed.
6. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for quashment and would submit that prima facie there are allegations against the petitioner herein, which would attract the offences as alleged.
7. In this matter, there is allegation that the 2nd accused, the petitioner herein also committed offence punishable under Section 75 of the JJ Act. Therefore, the question poses for consideration is, what are the essentials required to constitute an offence punishable under Section 75 of the JJ Act?
8. In this context, reference to Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, is necessary. Section 75 of the JJ Act provides as under:
Provided that in case it is found that such abandonment of the child by the biological parents is due to circumstances beyond their control, it shall be presumed that such abandonment is not wilful and the penal provisions of this section shall not apply in such cases.
Provided further that if such offence is committed by any person employed by or managing an organization, which is entrusted with the care and protection of the child, he shall be punished with rigorous imprisonment which may extend up to five years, and fine which may extend up to five lakhs rupees.
Provided also that on account of the aforesaid cruelty, if the child is physically incapacitated or develops a mental illness or is rendered mentally unfit to perform regular tasks or has risk to life or limb, such person shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment, not less than three years but which may be extended up to ten years and shal
The legal responsibility of guardianship regarding child welfare under the Juvenile Justice Act and implications of abandonment.
The courts cannot charge a stranger to a child under offences relating to child abandonment and cruelty under the applicable statutes.
The conduct of reprimanding a child did not constitute cruelty under the Juvenile Justice Act.
No case under IPC or JJ Act established as victim was not in bondage.
Insufficient evidence was found to support charges under the Juvenile Justice Act against the petitioner as she was not in actual control of the children and her actions did not constitute abuse.
The court clarifies that abandonment under Section 75 of the JJ Act does not require the act of leaving a child to be 'wholly' neglectful as per Section 317 IPC.
The interpretation of 'actual charge of, or control over' a child under Section 75 of the J.J. Act, 2015 should be construed in a strict sense, and liability under the provision depends on the actual....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for Section 75 of the J.J. act, 2015 to apply, the accused must have actual charge or control over the child, and the provisions should be con....
The court emphasized the requirement of actual charge or control over a child for the offence under Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.