SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ker) 824

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J.
ARAVIND S/O SUBRAMANIAN – Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application Nos. 5168, 5425 of 2024
Decided On : 07-08-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: P.M. ARUN DAS, K. ARUN, C.A. CHACKO, C.M. CHARISMA, VISHNU S. MULLAPPALLY, BABU V.P.
For the Respondents: BIBIN VARGHESE, C.S HRITHWIK, MEGHA K. XAVIER, PUSHPALATHA M.K.

IMPORTANT POINT
The judgment establishes that while the POCSO Act is crucial for protecting children, there is a significant need to prevent its misuse, particularly in familial contexts, and to ensure that false accusations do not lead to wrongful imprisonment.

Headnote:

POCSO Act - False Accusations and Bail - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 22 of POCSO Act; Sections 354, 376(2)(f), 376(3), 509, 451 of IPC - The court discussed the provisions of the POCSO Act, emphasizing its purpose to protect children from sexual offenses while also acknowledging the potential for misuse. It highlighted Section 22, which provides for punishment for false complaints, and the need for caution in handling such sensitive cases. The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the victim's retraction of her allegations and the implications of false accusations.

Fact of the Case:

The accused, two cousin brothers of a 17-year-old girl, were arrested for allegedly committing sexual offenses against her. The victim later claimed that her accusations were false and motivated by anger over her family's interference in her love life.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the victim had retracted her allegations, stating they were made out of vengeance. The court emphasized the need for caution in cases involving potential misuse of the POCSO Act and recognized the mental trauma faced by the accused due to false accusations.

Issues: Whether the allegations made by the victim were false and whether the accused should be granted bail considering the circumstances surrounding the accusations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the victim's retraction of her statements and the context of her complaints warranted a reconsideration of the bail applications. It underscored the importance of protecting individuals from wrongful confinement due to false accusations, particularly in sensitive cases involving family members.

Final Decision: The applications for bail were allowed, with the petitioners directed to be released on bail under specific conditions, including regular appearances before the Investigating Officer and restrictions on influencing witnesses.

ORDER :

1. These applications highlight the plight of the so-called predators in the present crimes, who have become the actual victims of an orchestrated act of retribution by the so-called victim, and it demonstrates the perilous consequences that can arise due to the false accusations made by a victim.

2. The two cousin brothers of the victim, who endeavoured to intervene in her love affair and have been incarcerated for the past two months, seek to get themselves enlarged on bail.

3. B.A No. 5425 of 2024 is filed by the accused in crime No. 451 of 2024, which is registered against him by the Thadiyittaparamba Police Station, Ernakulam, for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 354 and 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’, in short,) and Sections 3(b) r/w 4(1), 5(n) r/w 6, 9(n) r/w 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (‘POCSO Act’ for brevity).

4. B.A No. 5168 of 2024 is filed by the accused in crime No. 452 of 2024 of the same Police Station, which is registered against him for allegedly committing the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(f), 376(3), 509 and 451 of the IPC and Sections 3(a) r/w 4(2), 5(l) r/w 6(1), 11(i) r/w 12 of the POCSO Act. As the victim is the same in the two crimes, the applications were consolidated, jointly heard and are being disposed of by this common order.

5. The prosecution allegation, in brief, in crime No. 451 of 2024 is that; the accused (a 20-year-old boy) and the cousin brother of the victim (a 17-year-old girl), had, in the month of February 2023, entered her house and groped her breasts and inserted his finger into her genitals. Thus, he committed rape, aggravated sexual assault and outraged the modesty of the victim.

6. The crux of the prosecution case in crime No. 452 of 2024 is that; the accused (a 19-year-old boy) and another cousin brother of the victim had, in the month of August 2017, while the victim was studying in the sixth standard, committed penetrative sexual assault on her. Subsequently, on 25.03.2023, the accused again trespassed into the victim’s house and made her hold his genitals. Accordingly, he, too, committed rape, aggravated sexual assault and outraged the modesty of the victim.

7. When the applications came up for consideration on 29.07.2024, the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the victim submitted that the disputes between the parties have been settled. The victim, who is now a major, has filed an affidavit in B.A.No. 5425/2024, inter-alia, stating that the allegations in the crime are false and that it was out of her anger that she got the crime registered. Likewise, the victim's father has filed a similar affidavit in B.A.No. 5168/2024.

8. Considering the revelations made, this Court directed the victim to be present in Court. On her appearance, she and her parents were referred to the Family Counselling Centre, High Court of Kerala. The counsellor interacted with the victim and her parents and has reported that the victim stated that she had falsely lodged the complaints against her cousin's brothers.

9. After reading the report, I also personally interacted with the victim and her parents. The victim openly told me that she was in love with her classmate, which was objected to by the petitioners, who in turn informed her mother about the affair. Immediately, the victim’s mother stopped her schooling. It is out of this anger and to wreak vengeance on the petitioners, that she lodged the two complaints. But she did not expect that her cousin brothers would be arrested and the matter would become serious. She stated that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed the offences alleged against them. She has no grievance against the petitioners. The victim’s parents also stated that they were unaware of the complaints filed by the victim. It was only when the Police went to their residence, they learnt that their daughter had filed the complaints.

10. The above sequence of e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top